I have the theory that they are playing a mix between pump and dump and shorting. Where they borrow actions, sell them, say something dumb to make it drop, they buy and give back

Found a paper about it

https://www.ieee-security.org/TC/SP2019/papers/405.pdf

What did you do to get banned BTW?

Those devices may have a fingerprint. A lot devices can be uniquely identified. Here is an example that I read a long time ago so it might be wrong or I might not remember correctly.

Your phone has a gyroscope, compass and accelerometer. Those tools are not perfect. Your compass does not point straight north, so it has to be calibrated. That calibration produces like a 6digits offset (0.739842). If you look at all the calibration numbers for a device you get a number that is basically unique for each phone. So even if you used different networks, they can still know that you used a device that you had previously used or associated with you account somehow. That’s why brave is an important step in what I said.

Unbanned? No.

Make a new account? Maybe. But I don’t really know. I’d try with a paid VPN, and brave browser private window ( some time ago I tested brave, Firefox and chrome for fingerprinting, and brave gave good results out of the box)

The thing is that you (probably) made not effort to hide your identity. The people that make the bots, use all of them

For you the process is :They banned one of your accounts. That account last logged in from IP A. Right after that, someone using that IP is making a new account. Probably same person. Banned again

For the bots, at a minimum is: they just banned and account. That account always logs in using a very popular VPN. Their browser is non fingerprintable. We can’t just ban any new accounts created from that VPN. Registration allowed. (Probably show a captcha)

I feel like owning expensive stuff like that is non optional for the very rich. Those who answer things like “my phone already does that” do sound poor. They don’t buy it because they need the time. They buy it because it looks nice and is expensive.

I think I would make a disgusted face and say something like “really? It doesn’t look like it. What brand is it?”

Whats your point?

Yeah. Crypto bros ruined crypto with their greed.

Crypto is still really cool but now when people read that word they just think scam. So it’s never going to happen

I was about to make the same joke, but then I realized his followers are a cult, so religion again

I’m not form the us and don’t really care, but that seems off. Does anyone have a source?

I’ve lost trust in veritasium. I don’t remember the specifics right now but every video he makes I have to take with caution

What if they had a goose naned “dog” and just wanted to remember you to be a were of “dog”

If you ever want to be angry at the internet download a nostr client. 70% of posts are about bitcoin so you have to block those. After that filter a huge percentage are anti-taxxers, homophones and pro trump. That’s why I left it

The right amount

The other day I realized they did that because its APPle. I have no evidence but I’m sticking with it

Por when you think about it for more than one second. You went to school. If it wasn’t paid out of taxes it would have had (not a native English speaker, imnot sure if have had is right) to be paid LITERALLY out of your own pocket

I’m know that. I’m not arguing that detailed is better. It’s the post that is arguing that, with it’s implied “I can’t believe that thing got the first place”.

My point is that better is better no matter how it’s made. It could be pretty or ugly, made with paint or digital, AI or no AI

People: “omg why are you using AI to make a picture of a frog. Just grab a pen and paper and whatever you do will be better than what AI can generate” Also people: “lol. This pen and paper drawing is awful. I can’t believe it won Against this high quality obviously better detailed drawing of a frog”

My neurologist started me on some meds and expects me to go back every moth to get a new prescription. That’s not happening. It’s the second time I’ve run out of meds for mor than a month.

Also she says that ADHD can be treated with a 6 months treatment (which i interpet as “it can be cured”), which I’m not sure it can and says that Ritalin is for children while someone I know tells me that’s not true

Afaik when talking about computers you can be charged by acessing some thing (a site or a feature) that you know you are not supposed to. The same logic may apply here. If you got into an hotel, the unit was lockedand you used some trick to get it to do what you want, it could be illegal. They do not need a sign