• Admiral Patrick
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I just type “Speak to a human” until it relents. Usually takes 3-4 times. Kind of the chatbot equivalent of mashing 0 on telephone IVRs. The only question of its that I answer, after it agrees to get a human, is when it asks what I need support with since that gets forwarded to the tech.

  • Emily (she/her)
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    If by conversation you mean asking for a word by describing it conceptually because I can’t remember, every day. If you mean telling it about my day and hobbies, never.

  • I had fun with it a dozen times or so when it was new, but I’m not amused anymore. Last time was about a month ago, when someone told me about using chatGPT to seek an answer, and I intentionally found a few prompts that made it spill clear bullshit, to send screenshots making a point that LLMs aren’t reliable and asking them factual questions is a bad idea.

    • @friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      171 year ago

      asking them factual questions is a bad idea

      This is a crucial point that everybody should make sure their non-techie friends understand. AI is not good at facts. AI is primarily a bullshitter. They are really only useful where facts don’t matter, like planning events, finding ways to spend time, creating art, etc…

      • subignition
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If you’re prepared to fact check what it gives you, it can still be a pretty useful tool for breaking down unfamiliar things or for brainstorming. And I’m saying that as someone with a very realistic/concerned view about its limitations.

        Used it earlier this week as a jumping off point for troubleshooting a problem I was having with the USMT in Windows 11.

        • @friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Absolutely. With code (and I suppose it’s of other logical truths) it’s easier because you can ask it to write a test for the code, though the test may be invalid so you have to check that. With arbitrary facts, I usually ask “is that true?” To have it check itself. Sometimes it just gets into a loop of lies, but other times it actually does tell the truth.

    • @Zeratul@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I had a professor tell our class straight up, use perplexity, just put it in your own own words.

  • @friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    It varies. Sometimes several times a day, sometimes none for a week or two. I’d say about half of those conversations are about software design.

  • @FrankLaskey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    Maybe 1-3 times a day. I find that the newest version of ChatGPT (4o) typically returns answers that are faster and better quality than a search engine inquiry, especially for inquiries that have a bit more conceptualization required or are more bespoke (i.e give me recipes to use up these 3 ingredients etc) so it has replaced search engines for me in those cases.

  • HornyOnMain
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    Not as much as I did at the beginning, but I mainly chalk that up to learning more about its limitations and getting better at detecting its bullshit. I no longer go to it for designing because it doesn’t do it well at the scale i need. Now it’s mainly used to refractor already working code, to remember what a kind of feature is called, and to catch random bugs that usually end up being typos that are hard to see visually. Past that, i only use it for code generation a line at a time with copilot, or sometimes a function at a time if the function is super simple but tedious to type, and even then i only accept the suggestion that i was already thinking of typing.

    Basically it’s become fancy autocomplete, but that’s still saved me a tremendous amount of time.

  • @benjamin_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    I’ve attempted to use it to program an android app.

    2 weeks of effort… It’ll finally build without issue, but still won’t run.