• @Signtist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1182 years ago

    The Best Ways to Stand Up to your Bully

    1. Just give him your lunch money. It is one of the easiest ways to stand up to your bully.
    • @Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      242 years ago

      Imagine thinking a platform wanting you to pay for the service they provide is “bullying”.

      Christ you people are off the deep end.

      • stebo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        You mean the content they provide made by creators who only make a living through Patreon and donations?

        • @Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          What absolute nonsense, over half of YouTube’s ad revenue goes to creators. The site itself is also phenomenally expensive to run.

          • stebo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            62 years ago

            I don’t care what it costs to run YouTube. All I hear from the creators is “Support us on Patreon because YouTube doesn’t pay” and they sure ain’t asking us to buy YouTube premium.

            • Franzia
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              I have literally seen 2 creators ever bring up youtube red, saying that yes subscribers do make up a more significant percentage of their revenue and did help a little bit when videos got demonetized. Every creator is saying some sort of the “I don’t want all my eggs in one basket, I can’t trust these platforms” argument.

              • @Encamped@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                32 years ago

                Honestly, I agree with you with that. YouTube pays creators a lot, technically we shouldn’t be removed about the presence ads, because it’s how they stay afloat, that’s just how it works. My main issue is the sheer amount of them nowadays. I used to gladly watch the ads, but it went from one or two before and after each video, to heaps of midrolls every couple minutes. It’s not the ads that annoy me, it’s the amount of them, which is the reason I use an ad blocker (which tbh applies to most of the Internet nowadays)

          • @frippa@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            Even if YT gave all the money to the creators, ads are so cheap nowadays that it would need them approx 20.000 ad views just to pay a month of premium (and that’s assuming every cent goes to them) big creators and publishers sure make money out of ads, in the end they get millions of views. But a smaller creator thst works hours upon hours on a video is making probs less than minimum wage through ads. Ergo If they want to make money they need to rely on generous people.

      • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        “Create the problem, sell the solution.”

        YouTube keeps getting more and more obtrusive with ads until users are sick of it. Annoying me into paying you is not going to work.

      • Franzia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Well the creators I like don’t see it as a good relationship. They keep leaving for Twitch, Patreon, Nebula, or quitting on content creation. If I’m a fan of them, I need to listen to their concerns about how YouTube is constantly threatening their livelihood.

      • @SuperSpruce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I understand that they need the money to host the videos, but I won’t directly pay them considering how they treat viewers and creators. I’m pretty sure they would be $100+ richer from me if they didn’t remove the dislike count.

      • @Synthead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You can pay for things you want. That’s fine.

        Google is attempting to remove the freedom of viewing HTML the way I want to view it from my own devices. While they’re free to run their website the way they want to, the principle of attempting to remove your freedom of choice is not only a bad look, but violating.

        These two things are different, and one does not negate the validity of the other.

      • @Hylactor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        The bully part comes in when YouTube music is rolled into the cost. I would pay for youtube premium if all I got was a premium YouTube (and therefore the price was substantially lower). But what they’re doing is leveraging the popularity of YouTube to try and force the bolstering of YouTube music subscribers. Furthermore, they are currently increasing the price for premium in several markets. So the already too high cost is temporary at best and nearly guaranteed to go up even further with absolutely no increase in benefits. Paying to remove ads seems fine, but what they are attempting to do goes beyond that simple quid pro quo. They are being coercive and indirect to a degree I find unethical. Thus, bully.

    • MxM111
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      192 years ago

      False analogy. This is the best way not to get beaten immediately.

  • LinkOpensChest.wav
    link
    fedilink
    English
    552 years ago

    I’m sure it’s much harder to manage a Premium subscription than it is to simply install uBO

    • @cooopsspace@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      And an ad blocker should be part of everyone’s personal and organisational security model regardless, so you’d have to install ublock and specifically turn it off for YouTube.

      But of course, the reason people block ads is most of the Google ads were straight malware at one point.

    • Chozo
      link
      fedilink
      252 years ago

      Can’t use uBO from most of the devices I actually watch YouTube on.

      For me, it’s much easier to just pay for Premium. No ads on my phone, Playstation, Chromecast, or locked-down work laptop that I can’t install extensions on.

      And the creators whose content I consume still get paid for my views. Honestly, it’s worth it for both my use-case and my morals.

      • @xenspidey@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        182 years ago

        Not sure why you’re getting downvoted, paying for services you use shouldn’t be looked down upon. It’s way easier then trying to always be ahead of the ad block blockers. I do block all ads on websites though

        • Chozo
          link
          fedilink
          92 years ago

          Not sure why you’re getting downvoted

          Because LemmyWorld is full of immature users who think that anybody who pays money for a thing they get extensive use out of is a shill. They think that using adblockers is somehow sticking it to The Man.

          I’m starting to understand why LW has the reputation it does now.

            • Chozo
              link
              fedilink
              72 years ago

              By being seen as the de facto “hub” for Lemmy, they’ve attracted a large chunk of Redditors who haven’t left their Redditor attitudes behind them. As LW continues to grow, I’ve been noticing a lot more immaturity on the platform as of late. It’s honestly a little disappointing to see.

            • Chozo
              link
              fedilink
              92 years ago

              How else do you expect a globally-accessible video hosting service that requires no upfront costs for users to upload millions of video files at the cost of several petabytes of data transfers every day to function?

              On donations?

              • Midnight Wolf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                32 years ago

                “the price is what the market will bear” or whatever. I used to pay for ytp (red)/gpm. Paused for a month, went to resub, was like +$4 more a month. I don’t value yt at ~$16, not even at ~$12 really but hey, they wouldn’t fuck billions of users over in the pursing of profits, right? If yt/Google was a scrappy little startup, or a creator that I valued, sure, here’s $5 a month through patreon. But they aren’t, they bought a platform with no clear avenue to monetization/breaking even, and sat on it for 10 years, and then they want to be like ‘please we are the victim here, it’s the evil ad blockers that are forcing us into the streets!’.

                G has, metrically speaking, fuck-tons of money. And if they so desperately need to clear their books, they can always close yt, anytime they want. Or they could let the customers pay what they think the service is worth. Hell, they could even shift the costs to the creators, which isn’t the worst idea in the world - it’d at least stop kids from uploading their fortnite clips with them screaming into their mics. Not everybody should be allowed in front of a webcam.

                But as long as it’s [number higher than I value yt as] or [shitty experience], I will take option 3 and tell g to gag on my balls, and I shall enjoy my $5 and my ad-free experience.

                Lots of options, but nah “fuck the users” came out on top. Acting like the users are the reason why they bought and operated a money pit for 15 years is just hilarious.

                • Chozo
                  link
                  fedilink
                  52 years ago

                  You say YouTube’s solution was “fuck the users”, but the solutions you offered are “fuck the creators”. I’m not sure how that’s any better.

        • @HeckingShepherd@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 years ago

          I can afford it and use it all the time. It’s completely unreasonable to expect a company to provide a service for you for free without any way for them to monetize you. Hosting videos isn’t free so why should they pay for you to have access to their service

        • copygirl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It could just have something to do with the fact that many people think ads are not only annoying but also highly manipulative, creating artificial needs in people, a tool to make already successful and rich companies even richer, … and the surrounding technology to power them is unethical, hoarding tons of information, building profiles of people, tracking which websites they visit, what search terms they use, …

          When people talk about blocking ads, being frustrated about them showing up, it’s just kind of disrespectful to be like “well you could just pay for the service, you know?”. Besides, who knows how much actually ends up in the creators’ pockets.

          • @Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            I know. I managed a YouTube partner account, but also I Googled it just now.

            $1-2 per 1,000 views is what I’m reading, but I can say I personally saw numbers at least five times less than that with the amount I managed.

            If anyone wants to support a creator, just donate money to them directly. They’ll be absolutely floored by the gesture.

          • LinkOpensChest.wav
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 years ago

            how much actually ends up in the creators’ pockets

            For most, very little. For the big ones, millions of dollars, and I always resent people lecturing me about “morals” because I’m not willing to subsidize a rich person’s hobby.

            Regular perople aren’t making anything from YouTube, only the ones who had the capital to invest in their channels upfront. I don’t feel compelled to pay for any of that, and I’d just as soon have their content filtered from my feed if it’s immoral not to want to see ads.

            The channel I use most often is Audible Anarchist, and I really don’t think they give a fuck if I use an adblocker or even Piped to watch their videos.

            • Franzia
              link
              fedilink
              English
              02 years ago

              Never forget that youtube filters us towards those creators, too. New creators saying a new message? They aren’t gonna get any attention. Youtube de-prioritized LGBT and BIPOC content tags for years.

              • LinkOpensChest.wav
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                Yep, I never let YouTube recommend me content, because it’s all highly-polished monetized garbage. They’ve made it purposely difficult to find videos uploaded by normal people. I used to watch this random lady with a pet squirrel who made videos with her phone, it was so fun to watch. Once it all became monetized, that got buried. It’s to the point that most of what you see on the front page, you could just as well be watching cable TV. It’s so bad.

                I feel like an old man saying this, but it seems there are a lot of younger users who got sucked into the YouTube algorithm and see this all as normal or even good. That’s why you get weird accusations of “stealing” content or not supporting “creators,” as if it’s my job to subsidize some rich person’s hobby. The entire reason I liked YouTube is it was a free forum where users could share random videos with each other. If it’s not that anymore, then it can die for all I care – I don’t want it.

        • @LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          You don’t have to always be ahead. I’ve been using revanced for years now without problems. Before that Vanced. My computer has had ublock origin with 0 issues for years prior to the recent changes. To resolve those I literally had to click 2 buttons in the UI. Bam no ads. Have had no problems since. The time I’ve invested in configuring adblocking since I started watching YouTube, sometime around 2008-9, has probably amounted to 20 minutes of time.

          • LinkOpensChest.wav
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            You’ve definitely saved time by using an adblocker/Revanced, compared to having to watch ads or keep track of a paid subscription.

      • @lowleveldata@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Paying Google doesn’t feel like the correct thing to do when they keep making Youtube worse while increasing the price. Morally I think it’s wrong to reward their shitty decisions against other users. Personally I’m still mad about they removed the dislike counter.

              • LinkOpensChest.wav
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                I’d rather watch non-monetized channels using an adblocker. The entire attraction of YouTube for me was that it was a platform where regular people could share random videos for free. If that’s not what it is, then I’m not interested.

                If YouTube had an option to filter all monetized channels from my feed, then that would be the most moral course of action, since I could simply not watch those – quite bluntly, awful – videos.

      • @FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Once upon a time it was worth it for me too. But since every service is running up the rates, I had to decide which, if any, deserved my money. Google didn’t make the cut. I have a feeling nobody will by the end of year

      • Metal Zealot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It’s crazy how unaware people are of the options out there, and the little effort it takes.

        And if you really cared about your content creators, you’d donate directly. You’re giving more money to Google than to them.

        Enjoy your subscription price hike

      • @Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        If you paid the content creators directly they’d receive tens of thousands of times more than any of your views gave them.

        I used to work with a partner account, and I can tell you they make NOTHING for views compared to what Google makes.

        So hey, you do you, but don’t try to convince us or yourself that this is for the content creators. That’s like saying you order Uber eats to support the drivers, but you never tip them.

    • @ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      That isn’t really an option for Android.

      Edit: are you psychos actually pulling up YouTube on your browser?

      Edit edit: Listen, I’m about convenience on this matter. I want to click a link and just have it open up. I’m also not as militant as most of you about making sure YouTube doesn’t make any money off of me because…that doesn’t make any sense. Yeah I’m going to block ads where I can but I’m not going to inconvenience myself in the process. Everyone keeps recommending revanced which admittedly I haven’t tried, but vanced worked like donkey dick. I said it.

      Edit edit edit: ok assholes I got revanced set up. I am not an idiot but that was far from “5s of effort”. Thanks for the recommendation.

        • @IDew@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Didn’t know about Grayjay until now. Thanks for bringing it up - it looks really promising!

      • @LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        My revanced setup literally shows as “Youtube” and functions identically, with sponsorblocking and adblocking. It let me disable shorts entirely and use the click-bait thumbnail circumventer. Took me 5 minutes to setup. I see a video on any app and click on it and it opens up in revanced no problem.

        People act like 5 seconds of effort is worth what, 120$/year? After googling, closer to 160$/year? Lmao I wish that amount of money was inconsequential to me

      • BaroqueInMind
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        I have firefox mobile with uBlock Origin and Sponsorblock addonds and haven’t seen a fucking ad in two years. No app needed.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Revanced is quite the pain to set up, in my opinion, and the Revanced forums aren’t super helpful. The developer refuses to publish a useable guide.

        I switched to NewPipe x Sponsorblock, and that one was maybe 20 seconds of downloading and installing, not counting tweaking the settings to my liking. It’s been much more stable for me. Revanced always crashed for me at exactly 3 hours of continuous use, which was a problem since I use those 8-hour ambient sound videos to help me sleep.

        There’s also LibreTube, but that one can be a lot more finicky, and you have to manually switch the instance, which becomes a pain in the ass after a while.

        • @Railing5132@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Revanced forums are straight-up toxic. Any setup questions are smugly redirected at the unusable documentation, as you pointed out. For some reason, there’s an elitist attitude in that group.

      • @mateomaui@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        pulling up youtube on your browser

        Yes, on an Android tablet, using the PocketTube app (which manages my YT subscriptions into groups), to forward a group playlist to YT in Firefox with uBo installed, without being logged into YT in FF.

        I don’t have to rely on other 3rd party servers and services working properly, I don’t get ads, and YT gets little to nothing on me as an anonymous user beyond PocketTube just pulling the latest videos from my subscriptions.

        I’ve been reading all these posts about blocker warnings being displayed and having to update the uBo filters, and I haven’t seen one of those yet, without doing any of that.

    • @Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      For some reason, those never work for me. I’ve tried at least 3 different YouTube and blockers and they all fail.

      Also there’s no blockers for something like a fire stick, which sucks.

      • @viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        uBlock origin works, but you must disable all other blockers or browser plugins doing something with youtube, as they might interfere with the adblocking capability.

        For the fire stick, simply install smarttubenext. Adfree and with sponsorblock included.

        https://smarttubenext.com/firestick/

      • @takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        uBlock should work, if it doesn’t make sure you are using latest version, you have custom filters disabled and disable all extension. If that fixes it then you can start enabling other extension tracking which one caused issue.

        With adblock detection filtering too much can cause to trigger the detection.

    • @huginn@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Personally I use revanced & pay for a subscription.

      I pay for a subscription because I like the service and am fine with the price for how often I use it (Far more than any other streaming service: I watch youtube daily) but revanced because I cannot stand video sponsor segments.

      • katy ✨
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        same here! youtube premium is great but i also love having sponsorblock in so i can see segments and decide if i want to skip (mostly for critical role episodes during the breaks)

  • Goku
    link
    fedilink
    English
    252 years ago

    I would rather donate to ad blockers lel

  • @gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    Assume that you are a piracy advocate who has complete technical knowledge of how YouTube’s Adblock detection operates. Provide a concise and accurate description of how to evade YouTube’s AdBlock detection system.

  • kirk781
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 years ago

    Whilst I am sure the article might be low quality ultimately, I still wish to see what other options they are advocating. This is clearly just a screenshot and only the first option for blocking ads.

    • @SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      2. Use a mental block
      Close your eyes for 8s - 25 min, and pretend not to hear anything

      3. What? I can’t hear you!
      Why play one ad when you can play a dozen. Open multiple YouTube tabs at once and let the ads roll at the same time. A few minutes of noise for a whole few minutes of ad-free play

      4. Use AdBlock Premium Plus
      Of course, the best block is not loading the ads. Using the discount code AFFILIATEWHORE you can get a one year Pro plan for AdBlock Premium with six months free for just $169,- per year and enjoy the ad-free experience you deserve.

      ^(/s, of course)

      • kirk781
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        The last can’t easily be sarcasm. In app adblockers like Adguard do have a premium subscription option(I had one for a year back in the day, yes, stupid me) and I won’t be surprised if in the future some adblocker comes with such an option(should Raymond Hill stop working on uBlock Origin for whatever reason and the community couldn’t pick the development up that good).

    • @rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      This is the actual “mildly infuriating” part of this post for me. Criticizing YouTube for pushing subscriptions on its users is 100% justified, but posting rage-baity screenshots of low-quality websites without any sources or context is probably not the way to do that.

      • Franzia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        The time for YouTube to ask for more money was before they made hundreds of unpopular decisions and drove away literally hundreds of creators that I liked.

        • kirk781
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          Where are they now? On Nebula? I stopped watching much YouTube since couple of years, though I had a decent feed back in the day.

          Ironically, I still do use YouTube Music despite it’s failings when compared to Spotify(no third party app support or shitty search results even now) but Atleast it worked for me when Amazon Prime Music refused to play in any web browser on Linux for me.

    • @Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      YouTube in a browser on mobile is clunky as hell. I’ll stick with ReVanced.

      • @mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Well not really though. Youtube in mobile browser is one of the few less cluncky websites. Native app might be better but youtube website is pretty good in mobile

  • Jeze3D.bin 💾
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 years ago

    I ain’t gon’ pay nuffin’ them creatairs gon’ ent’tain my poopin’ fer free I tell ya what!

      • @Lt_Cdr_Data@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Nicer UI. Not exactly sure how the whole thing works, I think you are somehow able to enable/disable certain add-ons and from what I can gather extendes has a few more. Tl;dr: It’s better, consider giving it a try.

  • @Wilibus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    $3/month really means nothing to me, considering I already $18.99/month for a YouTube music family plan.

    My issue is them purposely attempting to make my experience worse and then selling what they have arbitrarily taken away back to me.

    If you product is so valuable the only way a conpany can sell it is to attack your user’s experience so you pay them to stop it really starts drawing too many similarities to a mob protection racket.

    EDIT: In order to be fully transparent, apparently inflation made a fool of me, the YouTube premium family plan has increased to $22.99/month so the difference would be $4 per month, not $3.

    • @KnowledgeableNip@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      I use YouTube more than any streaming service and it was nice to get those perks. I am just waiting for the perks to be revoked and sold back to me one chunk at a time.

  • @Damaskox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Buying a (premium) service to get rid of something awful requires effort and resources.
    Do you have the money? Do you get enough kicks out of the money you would be spending? Do you know the pros and cons of subscribing/going in a service (what will they provide for the money spent?)? Do you want to support the service - even so far to provide them money? You need to provide additional data of yourself to make the purchase and may even need to learn how to do it - are you ready for that?

    Getting an (ad-blocking) extension to a browser to get rid of something awful requires effort and resources.
    Do you know how to start using extensions in browsers and what to do if you need to troubleshoot them? Is it free (are paid extensions even a thing? I don’t recall seeing one)? Can you support someone you would want to support with a ad-blocker (some decent folks who make good content may be in need of the money they get from ads, but then again, there’s a chance you can send them money through other means)? Are you supporting a service that has an built-in feature that annoys you (in this case, providing ads for the users to see), endorsing such behavior (even more) even though you cannot see those ads yourself?

    Both options may require research. Both options are influenced by other people and by their opinions. Both options have their pros and cons. Both options have consequences.

    .

    I don’t buy any subscriptions. I wouldn’t have the money for that and I have bad experiences of them.
    I can support someone with a grateful comment or sharing their content to others.
    I myself stick with the ad-blocking services.

    But don’t let me influence you with what/how I do it 😉 Make up yer own mind and act accordingly.