• @n2burns@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    33 months ago

    Fair, but in that case I don’t think that’s “human error” but instead “negligence”.

    • @belathus@bookwormstory.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      Oh, no, I agree. I don’t consider ignoring rules “human error” when it is intentional. Management ordering a faulty safety to be disabled then getting someone hurt because the safety was disabled is so much worse than an error. Much worse, when I saw this happen, management then blamed the guy who disabled the safety.