Oh, no, I agree. I don’t consider ignoring rules “human error” when it is intentional. Management ordering a faulty safety to be disabled then getting someone hurt because the safety was disabled is so much worse than an error. Much worse, when I saw this happen, management then blamed the guy who disabled the safety.
Either that, or the processes weren’t followed. At least, that’s been my experience with regulatory stuff.
Fair, but in that case I don’t think that’s “human error” but instead “negligence”.
Oh, no, I agree. I don’t consider ignoring rules “human error” when it is intentional. Management ordering a faulty safety to be disabled then getting someone hurt because the safety was disabled is so much worse than an error. Much worse, when I saw this happen, management then blamed the guy who disabled the safety.