@realitista@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 1 year agoNon-binarylemmy.worldimagemessage-square209arrow-up11.43K
arrow-up11.43KimageNon-binarylemmy.world@realitista@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 1 year agomessage-square209
minus-square@LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink302•1 year agoThere are also only two different animals: elephants and non-elephants.
minus-square@whodatdair@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilink133•1 year agoAnything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant.
minus-square@casmael@lemm.eelinkfedilink70•1 year agoI think you are mistaken actually the different types of animal are frogs and not frogs
minus-square@itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilink63•1 year agoThere are bullfrogs and elephant bulls, so we can conclude that {🐸}∩{🐘}⊂{🐂}
minus-square@casmael@lemm.eelinkfedilink11•1 year agoHmm perhaps some kind of sliding scale is in order
minus-square@Jessica@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink9•1 year agoI think you actually want {🐸}∪{🐘}⊂{🐂} because ∪ is union and ∩ is intersection. There are no frogs that are also elephants so the set would be empty and thus couldn’t contain any bulls. 😔
minus-square@itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilink9•1 year agoAktshually, the empty set is a subset of any other set 🤓 But also, the fact that frogs and elephants are disjunct is conjecture at this point
minus-square@saigot@lemmy.calinkfedilink48•1 year agoYour both wrong there are crabs and then there are crabs 🦀🦀🦀🦀
minus-square@Shardikprime@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink15•1 year ago🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀 JAGEX SERVERS ARE POWERLESS AGAINST AUTH DELAY 🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀
minus-square@hglman@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoCrabs and will eventually evolve into crab.
minus-square@casmael@lemm.eelinkfedilink8•1 year agoDoesn’t that happen just once, when tadpolemaxxing has been achieved ?
minus-square@lugal@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilink10•1 year agoAs a non-elephant in the room I feel overlooked
minus-squareniftylinkfedilink5•1 year agoThe elephants exist in a state of being in the room and not being in the room
minus-square@SnipingNinja@slrpnk.netlinkfedilink3•1 year agoYou gotta address the elephant in the room for it to exist
minus-square@Zyansheep@programming.devlinkfedilink3•1 year agoThere are elephants, non-elephants, and undetermined elephants. This comment was made by the intuitionistic and/or fuzzy logic gang.
There are also only two different animals: elephants and non-elephants.
Anything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant.
This comment needs way more approval
120 is a lot.
I think you are mistaken actually the different types of animal are frogs and not frogs
There are bullfrogs and elephant bulls, so we can conclude that {🐸}∩{🐘}⊂{🐂}
Hmm perhaps some kind of sliding scale is in order
I think you actually want {🐸}∪{🐘}⊂{🐂} because ∪ is union and ∩ is intersection. There are no frogs that are also elephants so the set would be empty and thus couldn’t contain any bulls. 😔
Aktshually, the empty set is a subset of any other set 🤓
But also, the fact that frogs and elephants are disjunct is conjecture at this point
Frogness is a spectrum
That’s a very frogressive thing to say.
Your both wrong there are crabs and then there are crabs 🦀🦀🦀🦀
we are crab 🦀
🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀 JAGEX SERVERS ARE POWERLESS AGAINST AUTH DELAY 🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀
Crabbbbb people craaaabbb peopleeee
Crabs and will eventually evolve into crab.
deleted by creator
Doesn’t that happen just once, when tadpolemaxxing has been achieved ?
Crabs and not yet crabs.
Are these elephants in the room right now?
As a non-elephant in the room I feel overlooked
The elephants exist in a state of being in the room and not being in the room
You gotta address the elephant in the room for it to exist
You either are crabs or have crabs
Holy crab
There are elephants, non-elephants, and undetermined elephants.
This comment was made by the intuitionistic and/or fuzzy logic gang.