@realitista@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 1 year agoNon-binarylemmy.worldimagemessage-square209arrow-up11.43K
arrow-up11.43KimageNon-binarylemmy.world@realitista@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 1 year agomessage-square209
minus-square@itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilink63•1 year agoThere are bullfrogs and elephant bulls, so we can conclude that {🐸}∩{🐘}⊂{🐂}
minus-square@casmael@lemm.eelinkfedilink11•1 year agoHmm perhaps some kind of sliding scale is in order
minus-square@Jessica@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink9•1 year agoI think you actually want {🐸}∪{🐘}⊂{🐂} because ∪ is union and ∩ is intersection. There are no frogs that are also elephants so the set would be empty and thus couldn’t contain any bulls. 😔
minus-square@itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilink9•1 year agoAktshually, the empty set is a subset of any other set 🤓 But also, the fact that frogs and elephants are disjunct is conjecture at this point
There are bullfrogs and elephant bulls, so we can conclude that {🐸}∩{🐘}⊂{🐂}
Hmm perhaps some kind of sliding scale is in order
I think you actually want {🐸}∪{🐘}⊂{🐂} because ∪ is union and ∩ is intersection. There are no frogs that are also elephants so the set would be empty and thus couldn’t contain any bulls. 😔
Aktshually, the empty set is a subset of any other set 🤓
But also, the fact that frogs and elephants are disjunct is conjecture at this point
Frogness is a spectrum
That’s a very frogressive thing to say.