@AccidentalLemming@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-22 years agosdfsdfsdffoundation.mozilla.orgexternal-linkmessage-square207arrow-up11.87Kfile-textcross-posted to: privacy@monero.towntech@kbin.socialtechnology@lemmy.worldhackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.partyfrance@jlai.lu
arrow-up11.87Kexternal-linksdfsdfsdffoundation.mozilla.org@AccidentalLemming@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-22 years agomessage-square207file-textcross-posted to: privacy@monero.towntech@kbin.socialtechnology@lemmy.worldhackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.partyfrance@jlai.lu
minus-square@phonyphanty@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoThat just makes it harder to read :( I think the original sentence is grammatically fine.
minus-square@suction@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoMore words make read harder, that’s right. But you can’t use fewer words if the meaning changes because of that.
That just makes it harder to read :( I think the original sentence is grammatically fine.
More words make read harder, that’s right. But you can’t use fewer words if the meaning changes because of that.