@AccidentalLemming@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-22 years agosdfsdfsdffoundation.mozilla.orgexternal-linkmessage-square207arrow-up11.87Kfile-textcross-posted to: privacy@monero.towntech@kbin.socialtechnology@lemmy.worldhackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.partyfrance@jlai.lu
arrow-up11.87Kexternal-linksdfsdfsdffoundation.mozilla.org@AccidentalLemming@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-22 years agomessage-square207file-textcross-posted to: privacy@monero.towntech@kbin.socialtechnology@lemmy.worldhackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.partyfrance@jlai.lu
minus-square@Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish6•2 years agoEnglish isn’t my native language but still it feels very off. Is it even correct ?
minus-square@ADTJ@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglish4•2 years agoIt’s my native language and I have no idea what they’re getting at either. Don’t worry…
minus-square@phonyphanty@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoThat just makes it harder to read :( I think the original sentence is grammatically fine.
minus-square@suction@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoMore words make read harder, that’s right. But you can’t use fewer words if the meaning changes because of that.
“also because”?
English isn’t my native language but still it feels very off. Is it even correct ?
It’s my native language and I have no idea what they’re getting at either.
Don’t worry…
“Correct” as in an allowed use? Yes.
That just makes it harder to read :( I think the original sentence is grammatically fine.
More words make read harder, that’s right. But you can’t use fewer words if the meaning changes because of that.