Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared to acknowledge that the Pentagon has developed plans to take over Greenland and Panama by force if necessary but refused to answer repeated questions at a hotly combative congressional hearing Thursday about his use of Signal chats to discuss military operations.

Democratic members of the House Armed Services Committee repeatedly got into heated exchanges with Hegseth, with some of the toughest lines of questioning coming from military veterans as many demanded yes or no answers and he tried to avoid direct responses about his actions as Pentagon chief.

In one back-and-forth, Hegseth did provide an eyebrow-raising answer. Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., asked whether the Pentagon has developed plans to take Greenland or Panama by force if necessary.

  • DominusOfMegadeus
    link
    fedilink
    687 days ago

    This by no means diminishes this guy’s level of evil stupidity, but I’m entirely certain the pentagon had developed plans for all kinds of batshit insane shenanigans, including (but not limited to) invasions of probably most other countries in the world.

      • @GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        24
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Hegseth: You there! Jackson! I want plans on how to invade Greenland on my desk by the end of the week!

        Johnson: [Looks at filing cabinet full of plans for invading every other country] Oh, yeah, sure thing, sir. Gonna be a few all-nighters, though. Me and the boys are gonna need some pizzas and a few bottles of Mountain Dew and some cinnamon dipperz.

        Hegseth: No problem! Just take it out of the Preventing Kids From Being Thrown Into The Orphan Crushing Machine fund! You’re a good man Jackson!

        Johnson: Sir, yes sir.

        Hegseth: [takes enormous swig out of family-sized plastic bottle of bourbon]

      • DominusOfMegadeus
        link
        fedilink
        97 days ago

        Frankly, good planning is the key to success at just about anything in life. The concept of having plans is not evil at all. And certainlynot in a military sense. What if Greenland got taken over by vampires? You don’t know. In that event, it would be good to have this plan on the books. Probably in no other circumstance besides that one but hey, there’s not anything wrong with having a plan.

        • skulblaka
          link
          fedilink
          46 days ago

          “Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet.”

    • @ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      67 days ago

      We stopped maintaining a handful of them, but waay later than you would expect. At some point we decided we didn’t need a plan to deal with an invasion by the British empire kept up to date at all times.

    • @jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I find that a credible thought, though one would imagine an answer to say that they try to have plans for any concevaiable scenario, no matter how unlikely, and have done so for years.

      One would imagine if he was good at this politics thing, he would have found an answer to distance such plans from the current contentious situation.

      And upon reading, he said precisely that…

      • DominusOfMegadeus
        link
        fedilink
        26 days ago

        Or not even mention them at all, because what possible beneficial purpose could there be to divulging anything related to your military strategy or planning beforehand?

    • Rodneyck
      link
      fedilink
      37 days ago

      I thought that was the definition of the pentagon? 🤔