Plutus, Haskell, Nix, Purescript, Swift/Kotlin. laser-focused on FP: formality, purity, and totality; repulsed by pragmatic, unsafe, “move fast and break things” approaches


AC24 1DE5 AE92 3B37 E584 02BA AAF9 795E 393B 4DA0

  • 87 Posts
  • 962 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 17th, 2023

help-circle
rss



  • You conveniently dodged my question, then asked me stupid questions, thinking I’d have to agree with cherry-picked offenses by China. I am not a fan of China. I just think they are justified in defending themselves. Furthermore, I think it’s hilarious that the the US decided to offshore our high tech goods to have them manufactured there as if we weren’t ASKING to be hacked. The only solution going forward is CLEARLY domestic RISC-V manufacturing and not allowing our enemies to manufacture our critical technologies.

    Do I support China’s:

    • domestic surveillance: of course not
    • transnational repression: of course not
    • supression (sp!) of free speech and freedom of the press: of course not
    • bullying of its neighbours: of course not
    • aggression against Taiwan: of course not

    Do I support China engaging in pre-emptive cyber warfare against aggressors: absolutely

    Do I support the US engaging in pre-emptive cyber warfare against aggressors: absolutely

    Do I support Israel engaging in pre-emptive cyber warfare against aggressors: absolutely

    Do I support war crimes being committed by ANY of these countries: NO


  • Embedding Trojans in your enemy’s infrastructure and leaving them to be switched on in times of war is ABSOLUTELY defense. You may not like it. But that’s called cyber warfare.

    Quick question: Do you fundamentally disagree with what China is accused of but fully support Israel and the US’s extrajudicial backdoors, Trojan horses, domestic spying, pager bomb assasinations, AI targeted air strikes, and other clandestine war crimes just because they are perpetrated by “the good guys”?






  • @demesisx@infosec.pub
    cake
    toTechnology@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This is really cool.

    It reminds me of the Edinburgh Decentralisation Index: an academically rigorous decentralization index that the university of Glasgow school of informatics devised to quanitfy the decentralization of cryptocurrencies:

    The Edinburgh Decentralisation Index (EDI) studies blockchain decentralisation from first principles, archives relevant datasets, develops metrics, and offers a dashboard to track decentralisation trends over time and across systems.

    https://informatics.ed.ac.uk/blockchain/edi

    You should give it a serious look. IMO, it would offer some insight into academically peer-reviewed ways of quantifying this kind of thing.