• 19 Posts
  • 89 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 8th, 2023

help-circle
rss





  • Because hosting costs money, and sustainable services need revenue sources.

    News we read was put together by a team of journalists, editors, etc.

    Video streaming takes a lot of storage, bandwidth, processing, licensing.

    And so on.

    Price gouging is bad, but reasonable income is necessary.

    Billboard ads that don’t target users and don’t track effectiveness are dangerous financially for advertisers, and would pay much less to ad hosters.

    Anonymous, aggregated tracking is a healthy compromise.


  • Kudos for putting together good reasons that you don’t like PPA, while also acknowledging that Mozilla is trying to solve a problem.

    Yours is one of the very few reasonable objections I’ve read IMO - when the PPA outrage first erupted, I read through how it worked. Unique ID + website unaware of interaction, but browser recognizing, then feeding it to an intermediate aggregator that anonymizes data by aggregating from multiple users without sharing their IDs, with the aim of trying to find a middle ground seems fair to me. Especially with the opt-out being so easy.

    However, your points about classes clickbait encouragement, SEO feeding, and the uncertainty that this will solve the web spamminess as it is are valid concerns.












  • Why not try it for yourself on Linux mint first by installing plasma? Plasma 5 is available on mint - I believe Fedora has plasma 6.

    I use plasma 6 on my Opensuse Slowroll laptop and plasma 5 on my LMDE desktop.

    Overall, I’ve found plasma 6 to run slightly better (I was on plasma 5 on Slowroll too for a long time).

    Once you install and try plasma 5 on your current install, that will be a much less disruptive way to see how well it works for you.

    After ricing, both plasma 5 and 6 are pretty similar on my setup. The cube desktop effect isn’t there by default on plasma 5 of course.





  • As with all definitions, there is a gray area where people will have different boundaries on exact meanings. To you - a supplier relationship needs an explicit payment, which is a fair definition.

    However, the more widely used definition that most people, including me, refer to, is not necessarily focused on the supplier, but on the supply - what we use in our toolchains is a supply - regardless of how it was obtained.

    When there is an issue in a trusted supply, even if it was not a commercial relationship (a prerequisite by your definition), it is a supply-chain attack by the more widely used definition.