After serving more than a month of in-school suspension over his dreadlocks, a Black student in Texas was told he will be removed from his high school and sent to a disciplinary alternative education program on Thursday.

Darryl George, 18, is a junior at Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu and has been suspended since Aug. 31. He will be sent to EPIC, an alternative school program, from Oct. 12 through Nov. 29 for “failure to comply” with multiple campus and classroom regulations, the principal said in a Wednesday letter provided to The Associated Press by the family.

Principal Lance Murphy wrote that George has repeatedly violated the district’s “previously communicated standards of student conduct." The letter also says that George will be allowed to return to regular classroom instruction on Nov. 30 but will not be allowed to return to his high school’s campus until then unless he’s there to discuss his conduct with school administrators.

Barbers Hill Independent School District prohibits male students from having hair extending below the eyebrows, ear lobes or top of a T-shirt collar, according to the student handbook. Additionally, hair on all students must be clean, well-groomed, geometrical and not an unnatural color or variation. The school does not require uniforms.

George’s mother, Darresha George, and the family’s attorney deny the teenager’s hairstyle violates the dress code. The family last month filed a formal complaint with the Texas Education Agency and a federal civil rights lawsuit against the state’s governor and attorney general, alleging they failed to enforce a new law outlawing discrimination based on hairstyles.

The family alleges George’s suspension and subsequent discipline violate the state’s CROWN Act, which took effect Sept. 1. The law, an acronym for “Create a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair,” is intended to prohibit race-based hair discrimination and bars employers and schools from penalizing people because of hair texture or protective hairstyles including Afros, braids, dreadlocks, twists or Bantu knots.

A federal version passed in the U.S. House last year, but was not successful in the Senate.

The school district also filed a lawsuit in state district court asking a judge to clarify whether its dress code restrictions limiting student hair length for boys violates the CROWN Act. The lawsuit was filed in Chambers County, east of Houston.

George’s school previously clashed with two other Black male students over the dress code.

Barbers Hill officials told cousins De’Andre Arnold and Kaden Bradford they had to cut their dreadlocks in 2020. Their families sued the district in May 2020, and a federal judge later ruled the district’s hair policy was discriminatory. Their pending case helped spur Texas lawmakers to approve the state’s CROWN Act. Both students withdrew from the school, with Bradford returning after the judge’s ruling.

link: https://www.aol.com/sean-mcvay-says-rams-traded-010748362.html

  • @halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1252 years ago

    So… Where is the catalog of approved haircuts for students to pick from? Fucking fascist ideas being masked in bullshit like avoiding fake “distractions” in classrooms.

  • IHeartBadCode
    link
    fedilink
    1032 years ago

    Principal Lance Murphy is literally just going to die on this hill apparently. Between the massive cost the school district took because of the 2020 court loss over this exact same thing, and this giant L the school district is about to take for not only being now in Violation of Federal Law but also Texas literally passed a law, because of this asshat and the 2020 loss, indicating that he’s not legally allowed to do exactly what he’s doing.

    The school district also filed a lawsuit in state district court asking a judge to clarify whether its dress code restrictions limiting student hair length for boys violates the CROWN Act

    Which if you are unsure if your policy is violating a law or not, you should likely not have the policy until the court gives you more clarity. Because if the Courts do indeed indicate that the school is in violation of Texas’ CROWN Act, they’ve just handed this kid millions of dollars in restitution, which I guess they can just pile on top of the millions this school district has blown so far on litigation.

    You would think that at some point taxpayers would be up in arms, but nope it’s Texas, blowing billions on stupid lawsuits is their thing.

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      332 years ago

      How does a previous case not automatically make the current situation unacceptable? Do they have to retry the exact same situation over and over again?

      • @stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        352 years ago

        Because principal is a bully and willing to use his powers to destroy lives. The methods to protect people are very slow and so he gets away with it for years until the district loses a major lawsuit. Then he quietly gets reassigned or retires and we pretend the entire thing never happened.

      • 520
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        A previous case is certainly a good argument in court, however the opposition may be able to argue material differentiating circumstances that may not be immediately obvious (in general, not in this case). That is why it isn’t considered an automatic win.

    • @originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      262 years ago

      To be fair being racist has long been a winning strategy in Texas so you can imagine that their bag of tricks isn’t particularly deep in matters like this

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 years ago

      blowing billions on stupid lawsuits is their thing.

      That and blowing money on highschool football stadiums.

    • plz1
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      I’m not a kid, but looking back on this type of situation as an adult, I’d settle for half of whatever they offer as long as the administrator(s) driving this were also banned from all public education jobs in the state, permanently. Fines to the district aren’t a deterrent to bad administration on their, but fear of job security absolutely is.

    • @zeppo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      That’s our Fiscal Conservatives. Ready to spend endless money on stupid bullshit but very upset about spending that actually helps the populace.

    • BolexForSoup
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      What is the state apparatus for if not funding private interests through frivolous lawsuits?

    • fadingembers
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Fuck it makes me so mad when schools make boys cut their hair. My little brother had to cut his hair that he had been growing since he was in his single digits. It was devastating. This was back in the early '00s

  • @Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    802 years ago

    So their guidelines are openly discriminatory at best, and openly racist otherwise…

    It’s mind-blowing how quickly the US is regressing because we’re kowtowing to a miniscule minority.

    I’m openly curious how well a “liberal” minded individual who isn’t afraid to be an asshole would be received.

    • @PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      202 years ago

      Largely, the problem is that the far-right shows up.

      No matter how tiny the power grab, they’ll have someone there to grab it, often unopposed.

    • @mangosloth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      I’d love to see what a liberal asshole politician would look like, but i can’t see it working out today. As much as the right blows wokeism out of proportion, PC culture is still a thing in a lot of liberal areas, and if you’re not PC as a liberal politician I imagine you’ll offend the more sensitive parts of your own base. Didn’t Bernie Sanders get hit with some of that? And he wasn’t even that assholeish, he just showed a spine.

    • @pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I’m openly curious how well a “liberal” minded individual who isn’t afraid to be an asshole would be received.

      Speaking from experience here, people will actively, and sometimes collectively, attack you for it. They’ll gang up on you online. They’ll openly and often violently bully you in real life. They’ll even abuse the legal system to get rid of you if they are angry enough at you.

      Being an asshole towards shitty people (and the vast majority of humans are shitty people, myself included) is very VERY enlightening on how our rights and our laws are just a thin veneer covering what really governs our lives, and that is our feelings. Most humans could give a fuck less about logic, facts or he truth; they only care about their emotions and what they want because they are only connected to the real world through their emotions, not their minds.

      Humans are no better than base animals and being willing to be a horrifying House-level dick towards those you think are deserving demonstrates this, really handily.

      It doesn’t surprise me that poor young man was forced to go to an alternate school where the diploma he’ll get won’t be as respected by the colleges he’ll apply to. He probably told them off for being so blatantly racist and, in their hurt, they kicked him out.

  • @detinu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    692 years ago

    They don’t want to be communists and they’re literally doing what the communists in my country used to do

    • @protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      562 years ago

      They are being authoritarian, likely your country was also under an authoritarian regime in the past based on what you’re saying. Systems of economy are kinda separate

    • flipht
      link
      fedilink
      192 years ago

      They want to be authoritarians, whatever flavor they have to be to have power.

      They don’t want anyone else to have power over them.

      So when they’re in the out group, they’ll ramp up the persecution narrative, and when they’re in power, they’ll ruthlessly repress everyone else.

      All makes internal sense, if you’re an asshole.

    • TigrisMorte
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      Not remotely communist nor were the folks in “your country” communists regardless of what anyone claims. Always apply the “Is North Korea really a Democracy” test to any such labeling.

    • AggressivelyPassive
      link
      fedilink
      402 years ago

      It’s baffling to me, that the US always claims to be the champion of freedom, but runs most of their education like part-time prison camps. My school here in Germany didn’t give a crap about anyone’s appearance. If you’re street legal, you’re fine in school.

      • @LemmysMum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        That’s because you were raised to be a functioning member of society with enough tools to potentially succeed or excel.

        They were raised to fail upward while grifting and scamming on the side while fighting for the opportunity to be a wageslave and entering a lottery to be successful. Or risk prison and become an actual slave as allowed in their constitution.

      • Your entire country is smaller than Texas. It isn’t about all of the US. That’s silly. In most any other state, he would be fine. Texas really sucks, but it is not representative of the US.

        • juib
          link
          fedilink
          102 years ago

          Please shut the fuck up with this “but the US is big” excuse for every single topic, it doesn’t explain or excuse anything at all

          • It is putting into context that what one town in one state does is not representative of the entire country. The US has plenty of issues, but to say that all of the US is like this town of less than 8000 people is absurd.

        • AggressivelyPassive
          link
          fedilink
          102 years ago

          I’m hearing these and similar stories from all over the country.

          It’s not just about schools, either, but also colleges and education in general. And if you think about it, a lot of life too. Jaywalking for example. That’s a crime that simply does not exist elsewhere.

        • cerothem
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 years ago

          This doesn’t make a lot of sense in context, sure Texas has twice the land of Germany, but Germany has 2.5 times the population of Texas.

          Though I agree Texas is likely not representative of all the USA.

          • @zeppo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            So, Germany has the population of Texas + Florida + Georgia? Doesn’t sound that large.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    392 years ago

    Imagine being sent to the school with all the unruly and undisciplined kids because of your hairstyle. Crazy and so fucking racist.

    • Isn’t this in Texas or somewhere equally as shitty? They would have sent him to prison for his hair if they could have. School to prison pipeline is real.

      • Enkrod
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Texas passed the CROWN-act to combat hair-based racial discrimination because that very same school already lost two cases where they discriminated black youths because of their hair.

        For once Texas is on the right side.

    • @random65837@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      So if it was some freaky white chick with pink and purple hair all over the place would it be racist then? Because those policies apply to them too. Don’t be ignorant.

      • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        So if it was some freaky white chick with pink and purple hair all over the place would it be racist then? Because those policies apply to them too. Don’t be ignorant.

        Okay, where are the white kids being penalized by this rule?

        It doesn’t matter if “these rules apply to white kids” if they are only actually applied to poc.

  • @febra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    392 years ago

    This is how america is destroying its youth and their future just because they refuse to comply with their racist demands. This is how the entire world sees america.

  • zanyllama52
    link
    fedilink
    English
    382 years ago

    It’s just hair. Why is the school district so interested in restricting hairstyles?

    • AphoticDev
      link
      fedilink
      312 years ago

      It’s not just hair though. It’s the fact that a black student challenged a decision they’ve made.

      • @dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Specifically, it seems the school was explicitly told to target a single student in order for opening a way for the Governor to challenge the CROWN act in courts. It’s pure political maneuvering. Picking scapegoats and destroying individuals to advance racists agendas.

  • @pascal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    342 years ago

    I keep hearing America is the land of freedom and that Europe is way more racist than America.

    This story would have never happened in Europe. Suspended because of a hairstyle, wtf.

    • geogle
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      This is a newsworthy isolated incident. It’s newsworthy because of the ridiculous stance of the principal.

      Can we talk about France’s stance on hijabs in school?

      • @canuckkat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        132 years ago

        Not isolated at all. Black kids (especially girls) get targeted all the time. It’s usually ignored or doesn’t make the news.

      • @Rengoku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        122 years ago

        Lol if you think banning hijab as a good whataboutism example wait till you hear your hair is banned and must wear hijab to even attend public school.

        • Just here to point out that UK schools have also illegally forbidden some students from wearing afro hairstyles. In that case and this one, it’s against the law. The hope is that this treatment will not continue in both cases. We don’t need to resort to playing the suffering Olympics or whose country is worse pissing contests

      • @blindbunny@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Can we talk about France’s stance on hijabs in school?

        Yeah. I support it. I also support this young women’s choice to hair style.

        Your false equivalency says more about you then anything else you wrote.

        Get every fucking church out of public school and tax them.

        • @pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Okay, so how much money would it cost to get you to openly admit what happened to this dude is wrong and it’s irrelevant what happens in other countries?

          $10 via Cashapp? Venmo, perhaps?

  • @raynethackery@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    27
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Darryl George, 18, is a junior at Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu and has been suspended since Aug. 31.

    The man is 18. You can’t make him do anything he doesn’t want to do. He should just take his GED.

    • @Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      Hairstyle has been used TONS in the past as an excuse to be a racist pile of shit

      buuuut 18, junior? That’s grade 11? I feel like there’s more to this story.

      buuuut it’s Texas. So I have no idea.

      • @urist@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        Yea idk, being a bad student doesn’t mean the school should be able to dictate your haircut (as long as you aren’t having a hygiene problem. Young man looks fine in this photo).

        • @Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          02 years ago

          I HEARTILY agree with you. I’m just saying I strongly believe there’s more to this story than the school being like “ur sus cuz of your hair” but then it’s Texas, so that could totally be the case, and it’s actually just a coverup for their racism.

      • Kinda hard to get a good education when the whole system is holding you back. Even if this kid had actual behavior problems, whose fault do you really think that is, the parents that are fighting for him or the system that is actively against him, trying to physically mutilate his identity, and seems to be putting him on a fast track to a for-profit prison?

  • @Peaty@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    262 years ago

    I hope the family successfully destroys the finances of the people involved in these super racist decisions.

    • @ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It won’t, it’s not a racist policy. The people enforcing it probably are but if anything it’s a homophobic policy

      The problem is hair length not hair style

      Though some religious beliefs prevent cutting hair so there may be something there

      • phillaholic
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        The word you were searching for is sexist. I’ve been saying since the initial article that this might be unconstitutional under Bostock v. Clayton County.

  • @SlikPikker@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    232 years ago

    Barbers Hill Independent School District prohibits male students from having hair extending below the eyebrows, ear lobes or top of a T-shirt collar, according to the student handbook. Additionally, hair on all students must be clean, well-groomed, geometrical and not an unnatural color or variation. The school does not require uniforms.

    Land of the fucking free.

    Call me when the HOA allows you to plant clover on the front lawn.

      • Madlaine
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        To be fair it could maybe be counted under unnatural variations.

        He is styling it in a way that is not typical for the society he actively participates in.


        (second part not necessarily connected to your comment anymore)

        But I think it’s stupid to ban hair styles anyway. I often had some classmates with weird hairstyles and guess what, didn’t distract me from school.

        In my opinion the dresscodes for school should be:

        • cover your genitals generously, ass and boobies (regardless of gender. I think there isn’t place for shirtless guys in school outside of the gym). In general that means pants/dress/skirt and a shirt/top, but I wouldn’t care if they wear a toga or whatever.
        • don’t wear extreme political symbols or other obviously widespread offensive symbols (e.g. a swastika)
        • unless absolutely required by your religion, or physical reasons like a burnt face, never wear anything that covers your face

        And that should be it (this list includes my limitations on hair styles and tattoos as well)

        • @canuckkat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          62 years ago

          I know the Western world still isn’t into it, but should be allowed to wear masks if they’re sick or trying to prevent illness. Like they do in Asian countries.

          Especially by the point they’re in high school.

          • Madlaine
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Thanks for the input. honestly I forgot about masks, I would allow them as well.

            I’m more against wearing a bandana mask for fun and edgyness; or to not be identified if you trash the elevator, etc.