Running AI is so expensive that Amazon will probably charge you to use Alexa in future, says outgoing exec::In an interview with Bloomberg, Dave Limp said that he “absolutely” believes that Amazon will soon start charging a subscription fee for Alexa

  • Kalkaline
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1552 years ago

    Alexa is so bad though. Who’s going to pay for that?

    • LazaroFilm
      link
      fedilink
      English
      782 years ago

      “By the way, you can now pay for Alexa AI option if you want me to reply in a slightly smarter way, but I will still cut you off with ads and other useless things. To activate AlexaAI say activate”

        • @spitfire@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          Just made the switch to NextDNS. For $2/month I get a lot of the same features but also on my phone when not on WiFi. Still love my pihole though!

      • @JonEFive@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        262 years ago

        “No”

        “I heard ‘activate’. Thank you! Your credit card will be charged $129 annually. To cancel, please log on to the website because there’s no way we’re letting you get out of this mess the same way we got you into it.”

        • @bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          To cancel, please log on to the website because there’s no way we’re letting you get out of this mess the same way we got you into it.

          Unless you’re in California

      • @FireTower@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        *to the same degree of intelligence as you’ve previously experienced. (Ps if you don’t we’re making Alexa have a room temp IQ)

    • DreamButt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      Guess we’ll find out when they finally pull the trigger

  • arthurpizza
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1252 years ago

    We need to move AI from the cloud to our own hardware running in our homes. Free, open source, privacy focused hardware. It’ll eventually be very affordable.

      • @Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        Yes, and you can use run a language model like Pygmalion Al locally on koboldcpp and have a naughty AI chat as well. Or non sexual roleplay

        • arthurpizza
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Storage is getting cheaper every day and the models are getting smaller with the same amount of data.

          • @scarabic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Yeah that’s not a lot. I mean… the average consumer probably has 10GB free on their boot volume.

            It is a lot to download. If we’re talking about ordinary consumers. Not unheard of though - some games on Steam are 50GB+

            So okay, storage is not prohibitive.

      • @teuast@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        In five to ten years, imo, AI will be everywhere and may even replace the need for mobile Internet connections in terms of looking up information.

        You’re probably right, but I kinda hope you’re wrong.

          • @teuast@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            Call it paranoia if you want. Mainly I don’t have faith in our economic system to deploy the technology in a way that doesn’t eviscerate the working class.

    • @pyldriver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      222 years ago

      God I wish, I would just love local voice control to turn my lights and such on and off… but noooooooooooo

        • @pyldriver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I have home assistant, but have not heard anything good about rhasspy. Just want to control lights and be able to use it to play music and set timers. That being said I run home assistant right now and can control it with Alexa and Siri but… I would like local only

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I have that with just my phone, using Wiz lights and ITEEE. It’s the only home automation I even have because it’s the only one I found that doesn’t necessarily need a special base station like an Alexa or Google Home.

        • @AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          But you want a local base station, else there’s no local control. You want to use local-only networks like z-wave, zigbee, Thread, Bluetooth, etc, even though they require a base station because that’s what gives you a local-only way of controlling things.

          Matter promises a base station may no longer be necessary for smart devices to control each other, but it is rolling out very slowly

          I also wonder what I’ll be able to do with the Thread radio in the iPhone 15 Pro

          • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            The base stations are what uses the cloud/AI shit. The setup I have doesn’t even require an Internet connection or wifi; it’s entirely bluetooth. Why in the hell would I want a base station that costs money, is controlled by Amazon or Google, and requires an Internet connection for my local shit?

            I don’t want a piece of hardware that does nothing but act like a fucking middleman for no good reason.

            • @foggenbooty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              That is not necessarily true. Some base stations use the internet, yes, but not all. For example a Philips hue does not require internet access, nor does Lutron Caseta. As the other person posted, Home Assistant is the absolute best (IMO) way to do everything locally without the internet.

              Your system, while it might work for you, does not scale well due to the limited range and reliability of Bluetooth. You’d likely be better off to adopt a more robust protocol like Z-wave, or ZigBee and get a hub that you have full control over.

    • a1studmuffin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 years ago

      It’s the year of the voice for Home Assistant. Given their current trajectory, I’m hopeful they’ll have a pretty darn good replacement for the most common use cases of Google Home/Alexa/Siri in another year. Setting timers, shopping list management, music streaming, doorbell/intercom management. If you’re on the fence about a Nabu Casa subscription, pull the trigger as it helps them stay independent and not get bought out or destroyed by commercial interests.

      • @AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        Thumbs up for Nabu Casa and Home Assistant!

        I haven’t yet played with the local voice stuff but have been following it with interest. Actually, now that Taspberry Piis are starting to become available again, I’m on the fence between buying a few more, vs finding something with a little more power, specifically for voice processing

        • @foggenbooty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Get something with a little more power. Pi’s are reaching outside the price where they make sense these days. You can get an Intel N100 system on AliExpress/Amazon for pretty cheap now and I’ve got mine running ProxMox hosting all kinds of stuff.

    • Captain Aggravated
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      I do wonder how much of those voice assistants could run on-device. Most of what I use Bixby for (I know. I KNOW.) is setting timers. I think simple things like that can run entirely on the phone. It’s got a shocking amount of processing in it.

  • @5BC2E7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    642 years ago

    Alexa is more like a telemarketer disguised as an assistant. Every interaction is followed by a “by the way . Its a shit experience so I stopped using mine.

    • @Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      392 years ago

      Alexa was designed explicitly for that purpose. They lose money on every Echo sold, the whole idea was they would make money selling you stuff. Turns out people would rather use their Echo to check the weather, get recipes, etc. rather than voice shop.

      • @hightrix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        352 years ago

        I just can’t see a use case for voice shopping. There are almost zero instances where I want to buy something without having a visual of that thing in front of me at time of purchase.

        I could possibly see something like “buy another stick of deodorant”, but even then I want to see if there are deals or some other options and would want to check the price at a minimum.

        Seems like yet another MBA idea.

        • @SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          Yeah it seems the execs who had the idea for Alexa never used Amazon for shopping. It’s a shit shopping site full of scammy products. I’d never buy anything from them without checking out the prices reviews, etc.

        • @OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          It’s really only good for re-ordering things you’ve already ordered. It will let you know that it found something in your order history and then you can decide whether you want to order again.

          • @hightrix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            132 years ago

            And this makes sense, but I’d still want to check prices to make sure that my $3 deodorant didn’t get discontinued and priced at $30/stick.

            • @GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              92 years ago

              Well you think this way because you’ve seen what happened to Amazon in the past 10 years. 10 years ago, when they were getting ready to launch the Echo, Amazon was a great retailer that people trusted. Now a decade of sellers gaming listings and reviews, and Amazon customer service deteriorating, we’ve been trained not to trust Amazon’s defaults.

      • @Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        Ha, I use mine almost exclusively as a light switch. I don’t have to get out of bed to turn off my lights or turn on my fan. I’m sure they’re losing a bunch of money on me

    • @o0oradaro0o@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      Setting all my Alexa’s to UK English got rid of all marketing “by the ways.” I still regret going with the Alexa ecosystem but at least for now there is a workaround for the most rage inducing part of it.

    • @locuester@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      By the way, did you know that you can find out more about telemarketing with an audio book from audible on the subject. Would you like to hear a preview of that now?

    • @tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 years ago

      That’s often the case. They can have their cake and eat it too. Shareholders would expect nothing less.

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      I think the data is probably less valuable than people think, especially if the users expect an AI response whenever a data point can be collected from them.

  • Dem Bosain
    link
    fedilink
    English
    462 years ago

    Alexa has a feature where you tell it you’re leaving the house and it will listen for smoke detectors or breaking glass, alerting you through your phone if it detects something. Amazon is putting that behind a paywall next year.

    • Natanael
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      And much of it can be listened to by staff that are hired to label it to train the model.

    • @ViewSonik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      Yep, used to be much better. There was SO much potential with it too. I wish there was a Smart Speaker with integration into ChatGPT. Id love to stand in the shower and ask it shit

    • @CoderKat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      Yeah, they’re all pretty disappointing. I’d love to have something that feels like how movies portray digital assistants. Movie assistants never misunderstand you or say “I’m sorry, I couldn’t recognize your voice”. I’ve mostly used the Google one and it’s so bad at doing what I feel like is feasible even with inaccuracy.

      Eg, I’ve tried to tell my assistant to like a song that was currently playing on YTM but could not find a voice command that worked (and some commands backfired by making it skip to the next song). I’ve had very poor success with getting assistant to cast something to my Chromecast with my voice. It sometimes works, but it fails or gets it wrong so often that it’s not worth the time.

      Sometimes I use it for rewinding (e.g., “ok google, rewind 30 seconds”) because many apps don’t have granular rewind buttons and tracking on the track bar is way too inaccurate. But lol, it’s so slow! It takes a few seconds to figure out what I said (so I have to ask it to rewind more than I wish) and it seems every app is unoptimized for rewinding, as it usually takes several seconds of loading.

      It can’t really do any kind of research either. You basically can just ask it to google things and it sometimes is able to extract the meaningful part from simple questions. It’s a far way from how Hollywood thinks a digital assistant will work.

  • BigBangClock
    link
    fedilink
    English
    392 years ago

    Lol, pay a subscription to have a device in my home that spies on every single thing we say? no fucking thank u.

    • @RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 years ago

      I never got the appeal of those things even ignoring how their design is the antithesis of privacy. It just seems dumb to talk to the computer box, like it’s a thing to talk to when it’s just a microphone and software. I simply prefer direct, precise, and silent control of devices

      • @eronth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        122 years ago

        It’s good for hands/device free control. Setting timers while cooking by simply saying “set a timer” or controlling lights from across the room without fiddling with a phone or remote.

        • ram
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          Set a timer’s and set an alarm’s the only two I ever found useful personally. I stopped using google assistant because it just legitimately stopped understanding me correctly and I got frustrated with it.

      • GladiusB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        It’s very sci fi. Star Trek amongst many others from the 80s. If you are old enough then you would remember that this was the stuff of fantasy. I can see why it appeals to people with disabilities and possibly kids for homework or something. But I am 1000 percent with you on the privacy part. No thanks.

    • @DarienGS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      From the article:

      Amazon has bet big on AI, with the company unveiling a new, AI-powered version of Alexa alongside updated versions of its Echo Frames and Carrera smart glasses last week.

  • JuniorsCrackDealer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    292 years ago

    Ok. I’ll be the weirdo. If it’s actually useful, I would pay for it.

    Not if it’s just the parlor trick that it currently is.

    • @theragu40@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      282 years ago

      This is the killer for all this shit right now as far as I’m concerned. All of it lives squarely in “huh…neat” territory. I have yet to see anything I felt was truly necessary. Until that happens, paying is a non starter for me.

      • @JonEFive@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        This is why I’m so confused by Amazon’s approach. I know they’ve already sunk millions if not billions of dollars into this, so why has the user experience not improved in the last 8 years?

        I’m not going to buy things with my voice when just getting the lights to turn off or music to play can be an infuriating endeavor. Speech recognition has stagnated.

        The third party integrations are just so clunky too. They could have made money by selling licenses to businesses in order to access the service, but again, they haven’t improved that experience at all.

        The “Alexa, let me talk to dominos.” or “Alexa, ask LG to turn off the TV” is just stupidly cumbersome. Why can’t you set up preferred providers? I don’t have to say “ask Spotify to play music” I just say “play music”, so we know it’s possible. It would be trivial to implement other preferred service providers compared to the overall scale of Alexa.

        • @theragu40@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          102 years ago

          I don’t know if you’re in IT at all, but the really crazy thing is that as half baked as Alexa stuff feels…a ton of AWS’s offerings feel the exact same way. Their marketing material is great, and I do believe their engineers are passionate and have the right intentions. But none of it feels “finished”. It all feels like an elaborate beta test. Things don’t work, documentation is out of date or just plain wrong, it’s impossible to get actual expert support from Amazon directly.

          AWS is their biggest money maker and even that is a cobbled together, confusing pile half the time. Sometimes feels like everything is a house of cards.

          • @JonEFive@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            It’s weird to me that a company of this size is just that inept. It’s like once they have enough momentum, nothing can stop them.

              • @theragu40@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 years ago

                It’s really true. I’m actually annoyed that MS is starting to feel this way, particularly with some Azure related services. MS was always the one you could count on to at least be stable, well tested internally, and predictable. At least in comparison to Google and Amazon. But it feels like they have been leaving some of that behind with their cloud stuff as CI/CD becomes more prevalent.

  • @OrangeCorvus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Good luck, I guess? Got the first Google home, at first it was great, I was asking it tons of questions. Then the questions stopped, used it for turning on the lights and other automations. Then I installed Home Assistant and the only command Google Home got was to set a timer to know when to pull things out of the oven. Eventually I stopped doing that.

    At the moment all Google/Nest Homes have their mic cut off, I only use them to stream music in my house from my NAS via Plex. So yeah…

    • B1ackmath
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      I still use mine for voice commands with home assistant. Works great.

    • @tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      All mine to is turn lights on and off… very occasionally they might be used to find a phone, or set a reminder, but I wouldn’t miss it if that went.

      I wondered if I was unusual in not using the voice features much, but according to this thread it seems I’m not.