Namrata Nangia and her husband have been toying with the idea of having another child since their five-year-old daughter was born.

But it always comes back to one question: ‘Can we afford it?’

She lives in Mumbai and works in pharmaceuticals, her husband works at a tyre company. But the costs of having one child are already overwhelming - school fees, the school bus, swimming lessons, even going to the GP is expensive.

It was different when Namrata was growing up. “We just used to go to school, nothing extracurricular, but now you have to send your kid to swimming, you have to send them to drawing, you have to see what else they can do.”

According to a new report by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), the UN agency for reproductive rights, Namrata’s situation is becoming a global norm.

  • @ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    77
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Not an English native speaker so this is probably on me, but I find it weird to call it a fertility decline. Like, fertility of people is probably going down but the reasons people don’t have more kids are purely economical, as the article also says.

    For me a better descriptor would be something like birthing rate or whatever. Fertility decline sounds to me like people are really at it like rabbits and just cannot get any pregnancies.

  • Constant Pain
    link
    fedilink
    English
    75 days ago

    Capitalism needs to choose if it wants everybody to work to exhaustion with slavery wages or if it wants people to have healthy relationships and kids. Can’t have both.

    • JohnEdwa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 days ago

      Ah, but there’s the third option, just outlaw contraception and abortions. Capitalism is only incompatible with kids if you give your slaves the ability to choose if and when to have them.

  • @selkiesidhe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    387 days ago

    Good. We elect fucking fascists and let people murder our world, we as a race deserve to die out.

  • @Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    85 days ago

    The reason there are fewer child births in the US since the 90s is mainly the reduction of pregnancies in the demographic “25 and younger”. They didn’t made a conscious choice, looking at their abacus and evaluating the state of the world. They slipped into it and were forced to make it work. Interestingly, they then still had children later in life as well, for more complex and personal reasons.

    It seems to me, that if you give woman the choice, they choose not be pregnant at the cost of their career.

  • @ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    327 days ago

    When business is the world’s first priority, why does it come as a surprise that people don’t feel like bringing an innocent life into the orphan crushing machine?

  • NullPointer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    217 days ago

    i think there is a difference between low fertility rate and low birth rate. Its not like these people CANT have children, they are CHOOSING not to.

  • @SecretSauces@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    207 days ago

    Loss of biodiversity, climate change, more extreme weather events, ocean acidification, Gulfstream collapse, microplastics in literally everything, the rise of fascism, constant wars/oppression/genocides, everything being politicized and radicalized, capitalistic exploitation of consumers in every market, the mega-rich using their money to cause misery for profits, even more than I can think of right now.

    Want more reasons why I don’t want to raise my children into the world we are heading towards?

    One could argue that the Internet and how we are now so interconnected is the cause of a lot of these things, but I think the biggest reason for it all stems from a lack of compassion. Compassion for fellow humans, compassion for fellow living creatures, compassion for the planet at live on.

    • @tehn00bi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 days ago

      Like, I hate to talk shit about capitalism, because it is much more efficient at improving people’s lives, but basically every issue you describe is a result of capitalism.

    • @shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      77 days ago

      It’s important to everyone, including you. As the population ages, and fewer young people move into the economy, the tax base shrinks. Who is going to pay for government?

      Also, employers will have to compete for the remaining workers, raising wages. That’s good to a point, and then everything becomes too expensive, now you’re in a depression. It’s an economic death spiral.

      Taxing the rich only works to a point. Their wealth is mostly in the global stock markets, which will eventually crash. As well, the value of those publicly traded companies will nosedive as fewer and fewer workers are available to produce the goods and services.

      We’re facing the global equivalent of the fall of Rome. Nation states will splinter into smaller and smaller, self-dependent groups and the riches we enjoy today will be memories of a better time. If you want a contemporary version of that, look at China restricting rare earths. That’s impacting about every other country on Earth. Now imagine international trade utterly collapsing.

      • @RBWells@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        107 days ago

        Sure but you can’t have an endless increase in population. Whatever the problems of declining or stabilizing the population are, they need to be tackled, not ignored, yes. You can’t fix them by saying just keep the pyramid scheme going.

        The real problem is more like how many workers for each retired person. So there are other ways to fix that. Personally I’m down with working more years so that people don’t have to have kids if they don’t want to. I can’t imagine forcing people to have children.

        And you know what? Employers having to face a tight labor market doesn’t sound like it’s worse than employees having to find scarce jobs.

        • @shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 days ago

          Never proposed that growth should continue, indeed it cannot. But depopulation is going to steamroll us in the next century and I see no way around it.

      • @Killer57@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Humanity desperately needs to move away from capitalism, if it wants any chance of survival. Either that or we install a Universal base income system.

        • @shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 days ago

          Neither of those proposals answer the issues I brought up. But they’re very good for lemmy upvotes!

    • @AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 days ago

      I look at long term trends where the global population peaks in a few decades then heads down all too quickly, and find it important to act to stabilize that at a level a bit below here we are now

      • @orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        27 days ago

        It will collapse because we don’t regulate intake. Look at population collapse for rabbits as an example. We’re overconsuming and need to regulate now.

        • @AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          The problem is we’re over-consuming now, over-populating now, but will feel the effects of lower birth rates in 50+ years. There’s extremely delayed feedback on population trends, but that doesn’t make it untrue.

          Even conservatives sometime start from a point of truth. The problem is their solution is to turn back rights for women, opportunities for women. Technically correct, if you have no morals or empathy.

          For the rest of us concerned about this possibility, society needs to change a lot to remove obstacles from people who do choose to have children. And this would take a couple generations to take effect so we need to start now, to stabilize the dropping population in 50-100 years

  • @CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    147 days ago

    Maybe life shouldn’t be that expensive (food/shelter), and IVF programs be free.