After years of showy tributes and accusations of ‘rainbow-washing’, US companies are shrinking back for fear of Donald Trump, Io Dodds reports

  • @Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4528 days ago

    I’m straight and I won’t either. I don’t do business with bigots. Leave people the fuck alone. Mind your own damn business.

  • @ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    I don’t think Trump is the only reason they’re stopping. I think this is an example of where social media engagement algorithms - specifically, outrage driving views - made it a rational choice to stop. They were damned if they did (“rainbow-washing” and other accusations from the left, making more and more demands for authenticity under threat of boycott and bad PR), and damned if they didn’t (“gay agenda” and other accusations, threat of boycott from right-wing crazies who are now a significant demographic). Trump just gave them cover to throw up their hands and stop trying.

    To be clear, they were rainbow-washing, they were pandering. But I think there may have been a path where the loudest voices didn’t fence in the entire PR conversations, and I wish we were on that path.

    Because let’s be reasonable: it is objectively better that Target et al gives free PR to Pride and LGBTQ causes, even if yes, we all know they are a corporation and don’t mean it. That act of putting rainbow flags on t-shirts, of normalizing it in areas where it isn’t normalized, is itself an act that creates a safer space for LGTBQ people. It reinforces the social expectation and pressure to be tolerant, even if you’re a bigot.

    • @Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      728 days ago

      I do appreciate the rainbow cakes and 2in inseam shorts for sale though. The one month a year when you can find some cute stuff in bright colors. (At least physically, and indie)

  • Tempus Fugit
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1128 days ago

    What does it matter? It was always virtue signaling anyways. They’ve NEVER cared about LGBTQ+ people. They don’t even care about regular people. Hopefully less people will use these corporations and they will lose profit.

  • OldSoulHippie [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    928 days ago

    At least we can now tell who was in it for the right reasons and who looked at it as a cynical cash grab. We went out for breakfast for the first time in years to a bougie little brunch place and they had pride flags everywhere. You don’t see a lot of them in the little town I live in.

    Not that any corporation is your friend.

    • @Thistlewick@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      728 days ago

      It’s the same complaint. If I think someone is lying to me and they later admit to lying, my feelings aren’t different on the matter. They are justified. The fight for human rights doesn’t happen by just accepting when people publicly revoke their support for you.

  • Alaskaball [comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    928 days ago

    Shouldn’t have supported capitalist cooptation of pride in the first place. Their support is and always has been marketing to sell more shit in the pursuit of profits in the guise of having an iota of humanity in the profit-seeking machine.

  • barrbaric [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    828 days ago

    After years of disingenuous showy tributes and 100% accurate accusations of ‘rainbow-washing’, US companies are shrinking back for fear of Donald Trump because they think it’s more profitable, Io Dodds reports

  • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    On the one hand it’s not a great sign about which way the winds are blowing, but on the other hand my mind is just so much more at ease not seeing the cursed pride logos of Raytheon and the Pinkertons.