• steve228uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5102 years ago

    Nobody, absolutely nobody should trust that idiot with your ID.

    • pizza-bagel
      link
      fedilink
      2122 years ago

      If you always wanted to leak your ID to a bunch of hackers thanks to poor security practices, this is a great opportunity for you to do so

        • @TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          732 years ago

          then is trying to lose as little money as possible from this ordeal

          Bro he could have just bought it and done nothing and he would have been better off. I don’t have the same read that you do. My read is that he had specific strategic political interests in buying it and the money/ value/ revenue shit is secondary.

            • @EddieTee77@lemdro.id
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              272 years ago

              But the point remains that doing nothing would have brought more value so I agree that he isn’t trying to recoup lost money here

      • netburnr
        link
        fedilink
        English
        152 years ago

        Nothing the credit agencies don’t already leak every year or two…

      • theodewere
        link
        fedilink
        12
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        or everyone could recognize that he is far more malevolent toward you than any hacker could possibly be, but yeah, they definitely have no security that worries about YOUR data

    • @mister_monster@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      532 years ago

      It’s not about trusting some idiot. It’s about attaching your identity to your activities online. I remember when these websites used to advise against doxing yourself.

      • @HughJanus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I mean this whole process is explicitly for the purpose of attaching your identity to your online activities. If you don’t want to do it, just don’t.

        I shudder to think of what will happen when hackers inevitably get into Twitter servers and steal all those IDs though…

    • Magnor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      432 years ago

      Yeah. I’d rather hand it over to the weird guy at the bus stop. At least he’s not a billionaire douche bag.

      • @ShakeThatYam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Ironically, it’s going to be a bunch of “libertarian” tech bros who use crypto for “privacy” who will be the first to give Musk (and by proxy every world government) their ID.

        • @xmr_unlimited@monero.town
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Probably most monero users dont use kyc exchanges so i dont think they will use kyc twitter let alone the first ones. This may kill twitter, but there is lots of stupid out there like those crypto and bitcoin users lol so you never know.

    • @Strangle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 years ago

      Shouldn’t trust Twitter users either, they’ll take an out of context joke you made back in 2011 and ruin your life over it.

      Honestly, just fuck talking to people online. Literal no good will ever come of it. I’m just gonna stop communicating with people.

      This shit is so dumb, no upside, only downsides

    • @GreenMario@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 years ago

      He’s gonna dox all the liberals/lefties. Wouldn’t be surprised if this wasn’t the original plan.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        And journalists if they report on him negatively, or oppose his Russian “peace” talk suggestions, even if it puts their career in danger where they live. Peak freedom of speech absolutism!

    • HiramFromTheChi
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      Instructions unclear. Uploaded my social security card and DNA samples.

  • Dr. Wesker
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2672 years ago

    Twitter aside, if any website or app ever asks this of you, please nope the fuck out.

    • sab
      link
      fedilink
      892 years ago

      I guess it only occasionally makes sense for government web sites and banks. X might have ambitions to become a bank, so in that sense it might make sense.

      So another piece of advice: if twitter ever asks you if you want to start using it for banking, nope the fuck out.

      • @Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You Americans should get to this century and start performing digital strong authentications like the rest of us. Sending picture of your ID to anyone is insane :)

        How we do it here in Finland is that there are digital identity providers which use bank/mobile carrier to identify you. They then use MFA when identifying you. Any service can use these services to do strong authentication for you. And they don’t cost anything for the customer, and is really cheap for the company who wants to identify you. It is also build into the law that you must identify people using these, to avoid identity theft.

            • HeartyBeast
              link
              fedilink
              02 years ago

              But how did they authenticate your identity when you opened the account? I’d not trying to be an arse - but at some point it will likely have come back to matching some official photo id against your face.

              • @Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                02 years ago

                They once identify you from your driver’s license, government id card or passport. After that you for example link your smart phone to you, and you use their app when you identify.

                You can also use mobile carriers, they send a push notification directly to you phone+sim. Not sure what protocol they use here, because it opens up an UI which is plain android, and asks pin.

                Everything relays on chain of trust that since one service has identified you, the next can trust too. Plus there is MFA to verify that you actually made the identification request.

                • HeartyBeast
                  link
                  fedilink
                  02 years ago

                  The initial argument was ‘sending is to anyone is insane’ but that’s what you do with the bank. Yes it’s only once - but that’s the same as the other systems we are taking about here.

      • Dr. Wesker
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Idk, I’ve got my hands in a lot of financial cookie jars, and I don’t recall ever being asked for something like this. At the very least, not in this manner.

        • 520
          link
          fedilink
          182 years ago

          It’s pretty standard for European banks thanks to Know Your Customer laws.

          • exen904
            link
            fedilink
            42 years ago

            If you keep in mind that it’s only done with special certified subcontractors, then yes. I would never give that information directly to a company like X. And yes, also those special companies are more times shady than they should be, but still.

            • 520
              link
              fedilink
              32 years ago

              If you keep in mind that it’s only done with special certified subcontractors, then yes.

              Dunno what you’re talking about here but I’ve had to go through something similar every time I’ve opened a new account with a financial service.

              But yeah, I would not trust Twitter/X either. Musk is too much of an emotional child following whatever whim takes his fancy that day.

        • sab
          link
          fedilink
          72 years ago

          I know there’s a similar-ish process for accessing Spanish social security services online at least, and I believe it’s the same for some other services as well.

          Then again, Spanish public services are not exactly the gold standard for digitalization.

          • diprount_tomato
            link
            fedilink
            English
            72 years ago

            Wait are you Spanish too? Those websites look like they’ve been made by a secretary’s cousin that only knew how to copy and paste in the 90s

            • sab
              link
              fedilink
              52 years ago

              I just have a few Spanish friends! And from what they’re telling me that’s probably exactly how these websites were made.

              • diprount_tomato
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 years ago

                I mean, most public computers are very old too. Like 20 years old at leat

        • qaz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          I have the opposite experience but maybe it’s just different in the EU

      • Yoryo
        link
        fedilink
        112 years ago

        He’s definitely pushing for Twitter to be the next WeChat.

      • 👍Maximum Derek👍
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        To follow his dystopian vision of Twitter as the Everything app, in the US it will have to be a bank at some point. The same way that Apple is now a bank in order to power parts of their wallet and payment platforms.

      • Neato
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        The only government function that has ever wanted a “selfie” was for my drivers license and passport. Both of which feature that picture. But I’ve never done either through a site.

    • @BorgDrone@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      It’s stupid as well, because it’s impossible to authenticate an id or passport from a photo. You can just photoshop something and send that in.

      • The Prism
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        incorrect. it is actually fairly easy to authenticate an id or passport from a photo. Photoshopping something is easily spotted by a trained eye. Source i work as a document expert for an online ID verification company. the amount of fakes we spot each day are fairly large and its not all automatically processed. Also for those people that don’t know where there data is proccesed. there are actually a lot of laws in place to protect your data for example for EU citizens

    • Otter
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      Outside of services where you need to access it (ex. school / exams / government services), one beneficial one might be dating apps. There’s an advantage to being verified.

      Although none of them ask for ID from what I understand, just “hold up 3 fingers and take a touch your nose” or something…

    • Trebach
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Then nope the fuck out of Hetzner then. They asked that of me.

      • qaz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Strange, I don’t remember them asking me that.

        • ChaoticNeutralCzech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Only if you want to watch adult-themed videos, which they have been more lenient towards after the introduction of YouTube Kids and this measure. NewPipe and yt-dlp can still stream them, though, and you could also interact with the video (like, comment, save to playlists) using the official frontend last time I checked.

          • pumpsnabben
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            More lenient?!

            I like to watch people playing Hearts of Iron 4 (a WW2 strategy game) and most of the creators avoid saying “Hitler” to avoid getting demonetized and hit with an age check.

            It’s getting a lot worse.

  • TimeSquirrel
    link
    fedilink
    116
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    90s: stay anonymous, be careful with strangers, don’t give up any more info than you have to. The internet can be a dangerous place. Also, supervise your kids and have them ask permission to go online.

    2010s-2020s: livestream your life 24/7, use real names and emails everywhere when signing up for bullshit, hand your kid a phone and let them go buck wild as well.

    How did we stray like this?

    • @Lowburn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      642 years ago

      It’s also ironic that the same generation of parents telling us to be careful online and “don’t believe everything you see on TV” are the same ones that get their news from grifter pundits and divisive facebook memes generated by Russian bot farms.

      • @emogu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        282 years ago

        It’s remarkable isn’t it? Now we’re the ones telling our parents to turn off the TV and get off the internet or it’ll rot their brains.

      • Uranium3006
        link
        fedilink
        102 years ago

        growing up these days includes realizing your parents are shameful hypocrites who are knowingly destroying the world

      • @Strangle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        The funny thing is that you probably think you get news legitimately.

        But the truth is that it’s all propaganda. The only difference between CNN and Fox, or reddit/Twitter/Facebook, is the angle.

        But it’s all bullshit.

        ‘News’ doesn’t exist anymore, instead of just giving the facts, every article tries to tell you what you should think.

        • Pelicanen
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Oh, is this the fabled “bOtH sIdEs” argument?

    • @Strangle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      I still sign up for websites with the following credentials:

      Joe Blow 6969 Penetration Ave Beverly Hills, California 90210

    • @snor10@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      I miss the 90’s, a better time for sure.

      Feels quite dystopian at the moment.

  • dinckel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    882 years ago

    There is absolutely 0 chance I’m sending any documents to the clown in chief

  • @chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    792 years ago

    Man, Elon’s got one hell of a boner for WeChat, huh? I honestly feel embarassed for him. WeChat is WeChat because it’s Chinese – there is no secret formula for Elon to steal. The circumstances which created WeChat simply do not exist in the west and IMO it should stay that way.

    • @ShakeThatYam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      Tbf, I think he has wanted to have an everything app going back to his PayPal days. I still think it’s a stupid idea for the American market.

      • SuperDuper
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        There’s an entire plotline in Startup where the main character is desperately trying to create an everything app after seeing someone in an Asian country with 1 app on their phone.

        Spoiler alert - most of the development staff ends up quitting and it bombs on launch because nobody in the West is remotely interested in an “everything” app.

      • @hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        It exists. It’s called android! Honestly though, that’s why Google developed it. They wanted to maintain control and stay as the primary Internet portal for mobile users. Banking, messaging, gaming and productivity all passes through them.

        We chat has similar in China but only because competitors were stifled. It won’t work in the west as competition for any aspect will be better for some people and anticompetitive behavior will be clamped down on even if it started to work.

        • merde alors
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          isn’t weChat an app on android?

          how does this comparison work?

          • @hitmyspot@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            It’s not the same. It’s Elon thinking it can be with an app, but it can’t. It’s google realising over 10 years ago that to have that level of control in the western markets, you need to have an entire platform, not an app. Elon can’t even get Twitter to do one thing well, let alone all the things.

  • @gndagreborn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    662 years ago

    I, for one, want to thank Elon Musk for graciously backing up my highly sensitive government ID (that has my birthdate, eye color, height, weight), my biometric data, and likeness! It is such a nice thing to centralize all my most sensitive data into one giant honeypot waiting to meltdown. It is made even more appealing after he fired the entire staff responsible for maintaining this honeypot!

      • @krayj@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        Considering all the past, current, and future disgruntled employees - I wouldn’t be shocked at all by an insider leaking stuff like this. The company is unstable like its leadership - which isn’t very trust-inspiring.

        • @whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 years ago

          Well, that’s a possibility too, but I was expecting that they just lose the data through over-work or negligence. Remember, this is the company that DDOS’d itself a month or two ago and had to be told about it on twitter…

    • @Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      47
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      That’s literally what I thought about installing Chrome and sharing my browsing history with Google. Why would I get a Facebook account and share my name, my face and my daily activities with the entire world. I thought that this is just pure insanity, and nobody will ever go along with this level of stupidity. Oh, boy was I in for a surprise.

      Look who is laughing now that Chrome is the number one browser and many websites are only tested on Chrome. FB has so many users that people think it’s really odd that I’m not there with everyone else.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 years ago

          I don’t think it’s a fair comparison. Many people don’t understand computers or web browsers. They think they’re safe because they come from big companies and they don’t think those companies are stealing their data. After all, they didn’t enter in any personal info when they installed Chrome.

          Sending Twitter your ID is a whole other level. That involves you actively surrendering your personal information.

          Expecting people to see both the same way doesn’t make sense to me at all.

          • @Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Giving your ID to Twitter is indeed on a whole different level. I would never do it, and a lot of people here seem to agree with me.

            However, in my previous example I’m pointing out that there are a surprising number of people who don’t see it that way. Just because you and I would never do it, doesn’t mean much. There are always people who just don’t care about privacy or security.

            Maybe they don’t know much, or understand what they’re doing, or maybe the social pressure is so great that they feel like they have to get an account. Either way, I would argue that the number of those people is disappointingly high.

    • I Cast Fist
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      Sure it can. Just wait 'til it also becomes your banking app, keeping your money totally safe, then you’ll be able to double trust it. Would space karen x ever lie to anyone? /s

      • @DangerMouse@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        Of course she wouldn’t lie to anyone. Just wait 'til your totally safely kept money becomes programmable by central banks, regulating where you can spend it, when you can spend it, what you can spend it on, and builds a neat profile of yourself linking every single activity you do, online and offline. We wouldn’t want any terrorists or bad citizens to be out there now, would we? /s

    • @Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      If they ever have a data breach I’m sure they’ll totally do right by the consumer also 🙄

      Wouldn’t trust this clown with my digital words, let alone a copy of my actual ID

      • @RagingRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I’m sure they would offer 6 months of free credit screening as a consolation like all the other companies do. Just enter your social security number so they know what to look out for.

  • @Merulox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    272 years ago

    it won’t be mandatory, unfortunately. Would’ve loved to see another fediverse mass migration

    • gabe [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 years ago

      The eternal september moment for the fediverse is very much coming

        • gabe [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          Lemmy isn’t the only fediverse platform, Mastodon is growing rapidly as well

        • gabe [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 years ago

          Once prominent celebrities and more news agencies start to come (and they will, the BBC is a sign of that) the culture will shift faster than you really realize. There is still an insular culture around the fediverse that tends to be a big barrier around entry for “normies” right now. Going on a mastodon instance as a new user with limited technical knowledge can be quite jarring especially if you step out of line of what it seen as culturally fitting for the fediverse

          • @Kikkertje@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            52 years ago

            It’s very much a nerd/geek environment at the moment. There isn’t much for normies to look at…yet.

          • @AdamHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            This is pretty much the prospect of a former Reddit user like myself. I was there for eight years and stepping away from the bubble has not been easy for me. Not great at swiftly navigating the internet. I was used to having been served a whole cake and now I scramble for crumbs. I won’t go back because Reddit was built on the backs of free labor. Due to gilded cage syndrome, Ive bounced from Mastodon to Tildes and now Lemmy.

    • meseek #2982
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      Fuck. I was hoping Elon had a meltdown and made it mandatory.

      Not that Elon having some of your more pedigree info could possibly ever go wrong!

      • @WldFyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        Hey there’s nothing wrong with low budget tv shows! You can’t take my early seasons of Stargate SG-1 from me like that

    • @ErinCrush@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      It was so difficult to use for a long time, I only ever used it for breaking news. Then I finally found internet creators I liked enough to follow, maybe a few joke accounts. That only lasted for maybe a year and then Elon took over and it’s not worth downloading the app for anymore. Way too many right-wing conspiracy guys now.