• bedrooms
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    Conservatives on Reddit are saying they have to do the same to Biden. In their mind, it’s pure tribalism…

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      They’re trying to impeach Biden for literally nothing. They said they’ll figure it out as they go. It’s a literal witch hunt. They’re trying to make impeachments mean nothing so that twice-impeached Trump can shrug his off.

  • rebul
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    Does anyone seriously think this will pass Supreme Court scrutiny? I expect an 8-1 decision that will stop this silliness. As much as you hate Trump, surely you can think forward enough to see what an awful precedent would be set which would come back to bite you later?

    • Cyv_
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Just don’t do an insurrection and you won’t be barred from office based on the insurrection clause. I get some conspiracy theorists will try to paint everything as an insurrection now but if were at the point where that shit would fly I’m not sure whats stopping them from doing it already.

      We’ve been begging the dems to stop playing fucking nice with these idiots for years. I’m all for consequences for actions. Jan 6 was definitely an attempt at subverting our elections. Trump definitely participated in it and encouraged it. To not enforce the constitution would open the doors for worse.

    • @shiveyarbles@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      No, the precedent is needed. When you lead an insurrection against the USA, you shouldn’t be allowed to run for ANY office.

    • MxM111
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      The precedent of following US Constitution? That would be indeed a horrible thing.

        • Skua
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          They passed the 14th amendment and used it to bar a number of senior Confederates from office after the civil war

          • HubertManne
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Thank you. I see it in section 3. I was vaguely aware something like that happened after the civil war but did not realize it was part of an amendment. Its blows my mind to think the republican party did all this back then.

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Do you think people will just accuse candidates of insurrection willy nilly? I mean I bet Republicans would since they’re trying to impeach Biden for literally nothing. But I don’t think those will pass scrutiny. But Trump absolutely committed actions that could be considered aiding insurrection. Hense the 14th amendment cases.

    • Em Adespoton
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      The irony here is that Trump and the Republicans worked really hard to stack the SCOTUS with originalists, because that tends to play well with a conservative Republican agenda.

      But it also upholds the Insurrection Act. Remember that SCOTUS may be conservative, but they’re not all Republican lackeys. In order to decree this unconstitutional, SCOTUS would have to make a majority decision that what Trump did doesn’t fall under insurrection. I can see them wanting to stay out of THAT one completely, refusing to make a finding that would create SCOTUS precedent; that means they would leave these decisions in place in order to preserve future flexibility.

  • TheForkOfDamocles
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    SCOTUS is going to have to weigh in real quick if they don’t just stay out of the whole thing.

    • Very likely they will overturn the CO decision…most of the states declining to remove him are because the party has the say on the primary ballot…its a different story on the general election though. This is what the MI court basically said. They left the challenge open for the general election qualifications.

      Also SCOTUS declined to expedite the “immunity” ruling because they likely don’t want to take it. The appeals will very likely say “the president is not a fucking King” and the SCOTUS will decline to hear the case and say “what they said.”