Almost 90 bombs were dropped in one region in just 24 hours.

Russia unleashed an unprecedented bombardment in southern Ukraine overnight in what local officials described as a “massive attack” in the conflict which has continued to rage even as the international community’s attention has moved to the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.

The Ukrainian Internal Affairs Ministry on Monday morning said Russia dropped at least “87 aerial bombs on populated areas of the Kherson region - the largest number for all time.” At least eight people were also injured in other Russian strikes carried out in the Odessa region further to the west on Sunday night.

  • Track_Shovel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    902 years ago

    Looks like it’s all going according to Putin’s plan.

    I’m the last guy to put on a tinfoil hat, but the whole situation seems like it was engineered by Russia to take pressure off their war with the Ukraine.

    • @abraxas@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      462 years ago

      I’d say it’s simpler than that. Russia keeps funding regions it wants destabilized so something bad is always happening at a time good for Russia.

      No tinfoil hat, but total Scumbag Putin.

      • WuTang
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Yes, you prefer your James Bond chessmater plan than facts.

        • @abraxas@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Literally no idea what your trying to argue for here. I told the person above me that it doesn’t have to be some crazy conspiracy.

          Were you trying to respond to him? Or are you one of those people who thinks Putin is a saint? In both cases, I’m the wrong person to reply that way to. I’m the voice of reason here.

    • @SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      More likely an opportune moment for Putin. The Gaza conflict seems to have been primarily stoked by Iran over concerns over growing positive Israel and Saudi Arabia relations

      • @TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        And Russia has been purchasing large amounts of Iranian munitions. It’s not that far fetched for Russia to simply throw some money at Iran to throw a bit less money at Hamas to start some shit

        • @TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 years ago

          Iran does not now and never has needed Russian money to finance Hamas. This is a much older pre-existing relationship that its had with Hamas for decades. Furthermore, Iran and Hamas, as well as the other Iranian proxies, have a much greater interest than Russia in ensuring that Israel doesn’t normalize relations with the KSA and other Arab nations. Accordingly, while Russia is happy to see this all go down, there’s very little chance that they played any active role in it at all.

    • @nicetomeetyouIMVEGAN@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 years ago

      There was no real indication for the scope and intensity of the hamas attacks. Based on US and Israeli Intel. There were some kind of warning signs, but nothing pointing to this ferocity. I think fighters got far further than they could dream of, and the severity of the response is a direct reaction to the failure of the isreali army to see and stop the attack. It’s difficult to believe that the kremlin had more and better information to know that an attack would lead to war on the scale we see today. And I’m willing to believe that Russia sees benefits in arming hamas through the lens of geopolitics, they aren’t controlling the actions of hamas in any meaningful way, I certainly don’t believe that.

      Putin is just taking advantage and is absolutely never harmed by being seen as some kind of geopolitical mastermind. He isn’t.

    • @fosforus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Looks like it’s all going according to Putin’s plan.

      Which plan? Almost certainly not his first plan. I think plan B and C have been tried also.

    • @Littleborat@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      They said that the Hamas attack took at least one year to plan, maybe 18 months. Putin thought he would win the war on Ukraine quickly.

      So I have my doubts that this was perfectly orchestrated to take attention away at the right time.

      Russia and Iran’s strategy is more likely loosely aligned.

      • @Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Presumably he knew there was more than an outside chance the war took over a year. And it could easily have been assisted by Russia while already in the works.

    • @mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      Why not the opposite in that case? Why can’t the Ukraine thing be a distraction, if one of these events is a distraction for the other?

  • @MrFlamey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    452 years ago

    Fuck Putin, the warmongering cunt. I hope Ukraine continues to get Western support and can kick Russia out of their country, however slim the chances might be looking right now. Russia extending its influence and things gradually going back to business as usual, only for them to do it again in another 10 years won’t be good for any Western democracies.

    Haven’t really been following the Israel/Palestine thing much to be honest, but it would be nice if people would stop killing one another. Also really sucks that it benefits Putin.

    • @wandermind@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 years ago

      I truly feel like if we let Russia get anything that might count as a positive for them from this war, there will definitely be a new war of at least similar scale, but probably significantly worse and significantly less contained.

      • @Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        212 years ago

        We let Hitler take shit and it didn’t end well, the repurcussions of that are at war today.

      • @jarfil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Russia wants to keep unobstructed access to the Black Sea, for its freight and military ships.

        The EU and China want to keep a railroad from China to the EU, through Kazakhstan and Ukraine or Belarus, to cut in half the time freight ships take.

        Both need control over the same piece(s) of land.

        For reference:

          • @jarfil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            Russia has access to the Black Sea through the Sea of Azov, which is controlled by whoever controls Crimea… and to maintain control over Crimea, Russia needs supply lines over a land access at least across the Donbass, not just through a bridge that can be bombed at any time, as it has been already.

            Both the Donbass and Crimea, Ukraine considers to be Ukrainian land, even though the history of both areas is plagued by forced resettlements during the USSR times.

            Additionally, there are natural resources, some ports, and a nuclear plant in the Donbass area, which Russia would happily take over.

            • @wandermind@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              Russia has a long stretch of Black Sea coast outside of the Sea of Azov. They don’t need any more land to use that.

              • @jarfil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Please look again at the map for the Unified Deep Water System.

                This isn’t about having a port on the Black Sea, it’s about having ships from ports in inland Russia getting unobstructed waterway access to the Black Sea, from where they can go to the Mediterranean and beyond.

    • @TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      The chances aren’t as slim as many people seem to imagine. Putin is basically in a holding pattern for now. He’s holding out on the chance that Trump might win a second term, thus changing everything about the current dynamic. If Trump doesn’t win, Putin is probably in pretty big trouble since he almost certainly won’t survive a defeat in Ukraine and will be hard-pressed to find a good exit that doesn’t look like one.

    • @uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      It is sad to see Putin’s oligarchs “honorable buisnessmen”, while everyone else should cross border naked and without phones or laptops. If they were lucky enough to get visa in the first place.

      in another 10 years won’t be good for any Western democracies.

      Another 10 years of Putin won’t be good for any democracy. Fuck Putin.

    • @Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Putin the war monger? Bro, Biden is literally funding genocide. The west calling Putin a warmonger is insanely hypocritical. It’s not Russia that is responsible for most of the violence in the middle east in the 21st century, America is.

      • Lols [they/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        is this ‘the west’ in the room with us

        does he have a blog perhaps, id love to read his takes

        • @Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          “The West” means America’s zone of influence. Otherwise known as Europe, NA, and parts of other continents. Why are you questioning the definition of a word? It’s just what the term means.

          • Lols [they/them]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            i figured you mustve meant an actual specific person, since disagreeing with something doesnt suddenly make you a hypocrite if some guy you have nothing to do with in the same ~1 billion people group you were born into also does it

            is it actually hypocrisy that youre using a wrong definition for, then?

            • @Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              Every American that gives a shit about Russias actions and is not very loudly against American imperialism, even though their own country regularly does far worse wars in the middle east, and is currently funding a genocide, is a hypocrite. Even if Russia were somehow worse than America, despite committing far fewer war crimes and crimes against humanity, Americans who care about Russia need to STFU. When you have a problem in your own home, you fix it, you don’t go around criticizing others. Americans need to fix our imperialism problem.

  • @acidagfc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    362 years ago

    Makes sense, UN can only produce a finite amount of concern, not enough to express it on 2 major conflicts.

      • @AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You don’t understand what the UN is. It’s a common misconception.

        The purpose of the UN is to have a diplomatic environment where all can be heard in front of all others. It’s to encourage diplomatic solutions to problems and to defuse conflicts.

        The UN doesn’t have any way to do anything, it’s merely a fancy forum. Its members could meet at the UN and decide to do something (although it can be legally complicated) but that’s not on the UN.

        • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          The purpose of the UN is to have a diplomatic environment where all can be heard in front of all others.

          A dialogue that fails to yield productive policy is mere busy work.

          It’s to encourage diplomatic solutions to problems and to defuse conflicts.

          Right now we’re having a debate over whether a ceasefire would be antisemitic. That’s not a conversation that behooves diplomatic solutions or defuses conflicts. It just serves to distract public attention while folks in Gaza are exterminated.

          • @AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 years ago

            We all hope that you’ll graduate into the diplomatic corps of whatever place you’re in and single-handedly solve the world’s problems. Best luck to you.

            • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              02 years ago

              There’s certain openings. Since the war started, even Biden’s designated state department armies dealer can no longer stomach the job.

  • BarqsHasBite
    link
    fedilink
    English
    302 years ago

    It is amazing how the news cycle dropped Ukraine so fast. Not good for getting US support, but I think Ukraine can still get support from Europe.

    • @satan@r.nf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 years ago

      dropped?

      we never drop our money makers just because you don’t hear about it. Double the wars, double the profits. what are you even talking about? All I see is money money money. now we get to ask for even more money as there is more demand and limited supply.

  • WuTang
    link
    fedilink
    English
    262 years ago
    • Russian: fighting an armed country and fueled by NATO members
    • Israel: fighting. I mean BOMBING from their heated offices, civil without shoes and haven’t sleep for 2weeks

    Oh and between, Russia has been cut off from SWIFT, assets frozen if not stolen, etc etc… Israel? freepass

    You can’t make more cynical, and binary treatment, you can’t

    • @Guydht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      262 years ago

      Russia: fighting to expand their territory because they want a new world order led by them Israel: responding to their most terrifying act of terror ever happened on their land.

      Reason matters, and a lot. Russia has no good reason to invade Ukraine, Israel has a very good reason to invade Gaza.

      • @eee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        Lemmy is just weirdly pro-Hamas and anti-Israel.

        Don’t get me wrong, I think what Israel is doing sucks, but what Hamas is doing is equally bad. This is really a both-sides situation.

        • Karyoplasma
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Israel is killing many, many more Palestinians than Hamas is killing Israelis and it has been this way for decades.

          Also, doing wrong when done “in retaliation” is still doing wrong.

          • @eee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Also, doing wrong when done “in retaliation” is still doing wrong.

            So… We agree that Israel killing civilians in response to Hamas’s attack is wrong, just as Hamas killing civilians in response to persecution by Israel is wrong?

            • Karyoplasma
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Yep.

              Weird how you misconstrue criticizing Israel’s genocide with support for Hamas tho. Very concerning.

      • @Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Israel brought the terror on themselves. They are literally committing genocide.

        Also, Russia is fighting to maintain it’s black sea port, which NATO interfered with. That territory has always been Russian, and only US propaganda claims otherwise. Want proof? Go look at the board games Diplomacy and Axis and Allies, based on WW1/2 respectively. Both show Crimea as Russia. Or just look at Wikipedia, for this and other easily verifiable facts.

        • @T00l_shed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Board games as proof? Crimea was part of the USSR sure ,but it was transferred to Ukraine so it’s no longer part of Russia, nothing to do with Nato, Russia wants to expand and they should get fucked.

            • @Honytawk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              Russia never owned those territories.

              That was the USSR, which does not exist anymore.

              Russia has no claim to Ukraine, no matter what their propaganda says.

              Otherwise Italy should own most of Europe and Africa, since the Roman empire did.

              And by your logic, Russia should be confined to the territories of Khanate of Kazan as conquered by Ivan the Terrible.

              • @Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                Russia is the same country as the USSR, minus the parts that left. They are a global superpower, like it or not they get a say in what happens globally. And the idea that a critically important part of a superpower can just be convinced to leave it is insane. What did America do when a large portion of our country (one which also contained all of our access to our southern waters, btw) tried to secede? We went to war with them. Russia is doing the same. Why is it wrong when they do it?

            • @T00l_shed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              No because it was the USSR and they initiated the transfer, it absolutely is expansion since its not their territory. Reclaiming lost territory is such a terrible way to try and rationalize what Russia is doing. Unreal…

        • @teichflamme@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          If you go back further you had the Kyiv Rus there and it was Ukrainian plus parts of Russia were too.

          • @Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Yeah, I mean there’s a reason the region became the USSR for a while, it’s all very interwoven histories. There were times Ukraine was part of Russia, there were times Ukraine wasnt Russia but Crimea was, etc. The important thing is that Russia is clearly entitled to the area that has always been Russian, in some form or another.

            • @teichflamme@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              The reason the region became the USSR was Russian imperialism and military power.

              important thing is that Russia is clearly entitled to the area that has always been Russian, in some form or another.

              That’s not at all it. If anything Ukraine has not only the better claim to Crimea but also to some of the western parts of Russia than Russia itself.

              Historically speaking.

            • @teichflamme@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              02 years ago

              The main part of it was on the part that is Ukrainian today, which is why the name is derived from Kyiv.

              It was a multi ethnic state though. Russians of course wouldn’t agree, but they are not exactly a reasonable voice on such things.

      • @Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        There is a difference between invading and turning Gaza into a concentration camp.

        You’d think the Jews would know better.

        • @Guydht@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Oh right, Gaza the concentration camp where children are forced to work with no pay, women are raped then killed and trains are used to carry people for 3 days without water/food to a gas chamber killing everyone.

          Oh oops that was the Holocaust. Silly me, it’s just that the media told me Gazans are experiencing the holocaust so I mixed the two up.

      • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        Theyre both violating the Geneva Convention…

        There’s no valid reason to violate that, that’s the whole point of it.

        • @mwguy@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          Actually Israel isn’t technically violating the Geneva Convention. When you co-locate civilian and military targets, the civilian infrastructure loses it’s protections under the Convention.

          • Karyoplasma
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            The occupation of the West Bank is in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention, article 49. This has been established by the International Court of Justice in a ruling from 2004. Israel’s defense was indeed that the territory is disputed instead of occupied, but it’s the only country that holds this position. Literally the only country in the world.

            The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.

            Sources: Fourth Geneva Convention, ruling of the International Court of Justice (relevant are paragraphs 90-101)

            • @mwguy@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              02 years ago

              The West Bank isn’t at war. The Gaza Strip is. That’s the area Israel pulled out of and evicted (some at gunpoint) every Jewish settler; even those who had been there since before the 1948 partition plan. They’ve respected the 1967 borders there with no settlements as a way to prove that pulling back to those borders would lead to peace and not constant terrorism and warfare.

              • Karyoplasma
                link
                fedilink
                English
                02 years ago

                Ok, how does that support your argument that Israel does not violate the Geneva Convention tho?

                • @Guydht@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  02 years ago

                  It doesn’t, he just talked about how the west bank is not relevant to the geneva convention, and his point still stands in Gaza. Civilian and terror infrastructure is intertwined in Gaza, and that’s his argument.

    • @___@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      I don’t support Israel, but the Russians attacked unprovoked. They’re not 1:1.

  • @SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    232 years ago

    Can we please give the armed forces of Ukraine finally airplanes? The offensive is going nowhere if they are not supplied with an edge in combat gear.

    • mifan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      272 years ago

      Unfortunately it’s not that easy.

      They have already got a large sum of F16’s, but it takes training of Ukrainian pilots before they can be used in combat.

      From what I understand they should be ready to fly in early 2024. That still a long time to go - but you don’t want to lose pilots or planes because of inexperience with that type of airplane.

    • circuscritic
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Nothing the West is willing to provide is going to change the course of the war alone. That ship has sailed, this is back to an attritional war with positional fighting.

      The only thing the West can do now is provide LONG term commitments, written in law e.g. locked in funding for 5+ years of arms transfers.

      Unfortunately, I don’t know how good the odds are that will happen. I hope it does, but we’ll just have to wait and see.

      The ONLY other way for either Russia, or Ukraine, to win, is a new technological development that enables a significant change to the current battlefield dynamics.

      This is a fairly simplified analysis, but it does align with the most current assessments provided by both the Ukrainian and Russian military leadership.

    • bufalo1973
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Haven’t you seen the pattern:

      • Ukraine: Give us [some weapon].
      • US/NATO: No, it would mean WW3.

      Let some time pass.

      • US/NATO: Well, we could send you some [some weapon].

      Rinse and repeat.

  • BeautifulMind ♾️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    232 years ago

    At this point, pouring on the bombs (shortly after gloating that the new speaker in congress suits Russia) seems likely to be as much about shifting morale (getting Ukraine to worry that its support from the west will dry up with Kremlin toadies in control of Washington’s purse strings) as it is about on-the-ground strategy or tactics.

    It’s not like new Israeli atrocities detracts significantly from the world’s ability to pay attention to the atrocities in Ukraine, but anything that gives Moscow something else to gesture at gives it something to whatabout over, and getting the rest of the world (including nato members and US politicians) to fight amongst themselves (over whether it’s better to back a genocidal ethnostate or the terrorists resisting it) is always a win when the alternative might be for them to unify against your invasion of Ukraine.

  • @Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    222 years ago

    Lol to the comments saying it is engineered by Iran and Russia.

    WHILE ISRAELIS MINISTER ASK THE GOVERNMENT TO NUKE GAZA

    AND THE OTHER TO STOP PEOPLE FROM HARVESTING OLIVES IN THE WEST BANK. WHICH SHOULD NOT BE UNDER THERE RULE ANYWAY…

    If you allow and support Isreal attack on Gaza Without any form of accountability of War Crimes Based on UN definitions of War Crimes, Russia will do the same…

    • @TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      Russia has already been doing the same for a year and a half now, you absolute fucking nozzle. WTF is wrong with you people? Have you no fucking decency? Your selective outrage is telling.

    • WuTang
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      and at least, they do that against a sovereign and military state - and West providing ammunition and weapons.

      Israeli is really a piece of shit!

    • @PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Oh boy. Anyways, that’s just how the right wingers make themselves look more moderate by incorporating extremist into the mix to act as a lightning rod with their idiotic and completely ultraviolent positions.

  • @Illuminostro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 years ago

    And still getting his ass kicked by civilian volunteers with drones.

    Why don’t the Russian people get rid of this asshole?

      • @Zevlen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Ye, me too brother. People think 🤔 Russia is like easily changeable or something… I think people forget just how many Russians and other people Russians have killed and imprisoned since Russia began so to say. I think people don’t understand that Russia never had a democracy… Ever. I don’t think people get that it’s not easy to live and survive in Russia no matter when and where…

        Also it’s as if people pretend not to know that if You protest 🪧 anything in Russia; you’re fucked.

        People also don’t know that the policemen rape people / men in prison. They torture You and rape you. At anytime You can be put in an MMA style fight against an opponent who will brutalize You before You die of the physical injuries.

        I don’t think people understand that if the world doesn’t help to establish a democracy in Russia that Russia will always ; always go back to its corrupt ways.

        I don’t think people understand that there are also Russians who’ve been totally brainwashed just the same way that people got / get brainwashed in states like China, north Korea and Nazi Germany ( in the passed ) , imperial Japan etc.

        I don’t think people get that its not easy to be the hero a martar or organize a rebellion when you’re under a violent regime and when all you have is your small family or none at all

      • @MuuuaadDib@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Seems pretty simple, get tank, stand on tank with paper, scream loudly and voila we are done. Also, radiation salad works well.

        • @Piafraus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          172 years ago

          Comparing to this, getting into Russia is even simpler, so you can do all of those things, that are simple to you to type yourself. Go for it, we root for you!

    • @Zevlen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Gosh… Why didn’t the Germans kill Hitler? Why didn’t Japanese kill their “emperor” during world war 2? Why didn’t soviets kill Stalin or lenin ? What’s up with the dictators in China, why didn’t the Chinese kill them ? Why don’t the north Koreans kill their “leader”? Why didn’t Iraqi people kill Saddam Husain? Why didn’t Syria kill their Bashar al Assad? Why didn’t the Cubans kill Fidel Castro? Why didn’t the French kill Napoleon Bonaparte?

      Maybe 🤔😏 people just LOVE living under dictatorial regimes?

      Who knows?.. We’ll probably never know…

      /S

  • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Well, given that at the same time as Russia dropped 100 bombs, once, Israel dropped 400+ (and in a much more heavilly populated area, so killing about 10s or maybe even 100 times more civilians), every night, it’s hardly surprising that at least the people who were against the Russian invasion of Ukraine as a question of principle (the strong attacking the weak, the murdering of innocent civilians for merelly having been born were they were born, the calous disregard for people’s lives and so on) are focused were a far more extreme case of it is happenning.

    That in Palestine, the US and some of the largest European nations, unlike in Ukraine, actually support the strong who are murdering innocent civilians in massive numbers, just makes those who are natural supporters of victims to be even more focused on Palestine since the “great” powers in that case have not sided with the main victims but instead are giving cover and even monetary and military support to the side commiting a genocide, making such people feel their support is even more needed in the face of such “coalition of the strong”.

    Meanwhile the crowd who are driven to take sides for reasons other than principle or morality are also being guided to focus on Palestine, the nationalists in nations which support one of the sides because their nation’s leader or favored politician is supporting that side, whilst the ones who mindlessly follow the baiting of the more propagandistic news and social media because the propaganda in most of those newspapers, TV channels and social networks is now entirelly focused on Palestine.

    In summary, the crowd driven by morals and principles are focused where the greatest underdogs are being victimized the most and, worse, that is supported by the powerful, and the rest are either looking at the same because that’s were their national or political leaders point them to or because pretty much the entirety of the propaganda in the most manipulated newsmedia or social media is about that.

    It’s almost paradoxical that Ukraine’s success at stopping Russia (thus avoiding the kind of mass civilian casualties there would be in something like a siege of Kiyv) thanks to the help of nations that are now supporting a side doing the invasion an mass killings, means that their plight is merelly a fraction of that of the Palestinians hence they eyes of the World are turned to the latter.

      • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Nobody forces you to read those.

        It’s absolutelly fine to stick to simple bite-sized ideas that simplify everything to black and white for those for whom complex views are too much to digest as is absolutelly fine for others to prepare full meals for those who can and want to feed their brains with more than just fizzy drinks and candy.

        However if scrolling down a little bit to go over that text causes you movement sickness as you illustrated, I do apologize and promise to give the appropriate level of consideration for people suffering from such a disability.

  • krzschlss
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    Buy 2 TVs, so you can watch both human miseries unfold at the same time! Better than anything Hollywood or Bollywood or Nollywood could ever produce! And when you get bored, just vote in another war fueling and genocide financing psychopathic “lesser evil” moron into the office, so you never get bored of human despair and pain.

  • Resol van Lemmy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    I think he doesn’t want Laos to be the most bombed country in the world anymore.

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      90 bombs is more what was dropped per second there, not per day