Almost 90 bombs were dropped in one region in just 24 hours.

Russia unleashed an unprecedented bombardment in southern Ukraine overnight in what local officials described as a “massive attack” in the conflict which has continued to rage even as the international community’s attention has moved to the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.

The Ukrainian Internal Affairs Ministry on Monday morning said Russia dropped at least “87 aerial bombs on populated areas of the Kherson region - the largest number for all time.” At least eight people were also injured in other Russian strikes carried out in the Odessa region further to the west on Sunday night.

  • WuTang
    link
    fedilink
    English
    262 years ago
    • Russian: fighting an armed country and fueled by NATO members
    • Israel: fighting. I mean BOMBING from their heated offices, civil without shoes and haven’t sleep for 2weeks

    Oh and between, Russia has been cut off from SWIFT, assets frozen if not stolen, etc etc… Israel? freepass

    You can’t make more cynical, and binary treatment, you can’t

    • @Guydht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      262 years ago

      Russia: fighting to expand their territory because they want a new world order led by them Israel: responding to their most terrifying act of terror ever happened on their land.

      Reason matters, and a lot. Russia has no good reason to invade Ukraine, Israel has a very good reason to invade Gaza.

      • @eee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        Lemmy is just weirdly pro-Hamas and anti-Israel.

        Don’t get me wrong, I think what Israel is doing sucks, but what Hamas is doing is equally bad. This is really a both-sides situation.

        • Karyoplasma
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Israel is killing many, many more Palestinians than Hamas is killing Israelis and it has been this way for decades.

          Also, doing wrong when done “in retaliation” is still doing wrong.

          • @eee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Also, doing wrong when done “in retaliation” is still doing wrong.

            So… We agree that Israel killing civilians in response to Hamas’s attack is wrong, just as Hamas killing civilians in response to persecution by Israel is wrong?

            • Karyoplasma
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Yep.

              Weird how you misconstrue criticizing Israel’s genocide with support for Hamas tho. Very concerning.

      • @Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Israel brought the terror on themselves. They are literally committing genocide.

        Also, Russia is fighting to maintain it’s black sea port, which NATO interfered with. That territory has always been Russian, and only US propaganda claims otherwise. Want proof? Go look at the board games Diplomacy and Axis and Allies, based on WW1/2 respectively. Both show Crimea as Russia. Or just look at Wikipedia, for this and other easily verifiable facts.

        • @T00l_shed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Board games as proof? Crimea was part of the USSR sure ,but it was transferred to Ukraine so it’s no longer part of Russia, nothing to do with Nato, Russia wants to expand and they should get fucked.

            • @T00l_shed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              No because it was the USSR and they initiated the transfer, it absolutely is expansion since its not their territory. Reclaiming lost territory is such a terrible way to try and rationalize what Russia is doing. Unreal…

            • @Honytawk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              Russia never owned those territories.

              That was the USSR, which does not exist anymore.

              Russia has no claim to Ukraine, no matter what their propaganda says.

              Otherwise Italy should own most of Europe and Africa, since the Roman empire did.

              And by your logic, Russia should be confined to the territories of Khanate of Kazan as conquered by Ivan the Terrible.

              • @Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                Russia is the same country as the USSR, minus the parts that left. They are a global superpower, like it or not they get a say in what happens globally. And the idea that a critically important part of a superpower can just be convinced to leave it is insane. What did America do when a large portion of our country (one which also contained all of our access to our southern waters, btw) tried to secede? We went to war with them. Russia is doing the same. Why is it wrong when they do it?

        • @teichflamme@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          If you go back further you had the Kyiv Rus there and it was Ukrainian plus parts of Russia were too.

          • @Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Yeah, I mean there’s a reason the region became the USSR for a while, it’s all very interwoven histories. There were times Ukraine was part of Russia, there were times Ukraine wasnt Russia but Crimea was, etc. The important thing is that Russia is clearly entitled to the area that has always been Russian, in some form or another.

            • @teichflamme@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              The reason the region became the USSR was Russian imperialism and military power.

              important thing is that Russia is clearly entitled to the area that has always been Russian, in some form or another.

              That’s not at all it. If anything Ukraine has not only the better claim to Crimea but also to some of the western parts of Russia than Russia itself.

              Historically speaking.

            • @teichflamme@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              02 years ago

              The main part of it was on the part that is Ukrainian today, which is why the name is derived from Kyiv.

              It was a multi ethnic state though. Russians of course wouldn’t agree, but they are not exactly a reasonable voice on such things.

      • @Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        There is a difference between invading and turning Gaza into a concentration camp.

        You’d think the Jews would know better.

        • @Guydht@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Oh right, Gaza the concentration camp where children are forced to work with no pay, women are raped then killed and trains are used to carry people for 3 days without water/food to a gas chamber killing everyone.

          Oh oops that was the Holocaust. Silly me, it’s just that the media told me Gazans are experiencing the holocaust so I mixed the two up.

      • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        Theyre both violating the Geneva Convention…

        There’s no valid reason to violate that, that’s the whole point of it.

        • @mwguy@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          Actually Israel isn’t technically violating the Geneva Convention. When you co-locate civilian and military targets, the civilian infrastructure loses it’s protections under the Convention.

          • Karyoplasma
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            The occupation of the West Bank is in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention, article 49. This has been established by the International Court of Justice in a ruling from 2004. Israel’s defense was indeed that the territory is disputed instead of occupied, but it’s the only country that holds this position. Literally the only country in the world.

            The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.

            Sources: Fourth Geneva Convention, ruling of the International Court of Justice (relevant are paragraphs 90-101)

            • @mwguy@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              02 years ago

              The West Bank isn’t at war. The Gaza Strip is. That’s the area Israel pulled out of and evicted (some at gunpoint) every Jewish settler; even those who had been there since before the 1948 partition plan. They’ve respected the 1967 borders there with no settlements as a way to prove that pulling back to those borders would lead to peace and not constant terrorism and warfare.

              • Karyoplasma
                link
                fedilink
                English
                02 years ago

                Ok, how does that support your argument that Israel does not violate the Geneva Convention tho?

                • @Guydht@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  02 years ago

                  It doesn’t, he just talked about how the west bank is not relevant to the geneva convention, and his point still stands in Gaza. Civilian and terror infrastructure is intertwined in Gaza, and that’s his argument.

    • @___@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      I don’t support Israel, but the Russians attacked unprovoked. They’re not 1:1.