• @rickdg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    612 years ago

    Take your money and spend it somewhere else. That’s the only sound corporations can hear.

  • @djsoren19@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    432 years ago

    It’s already too late. The time for us to shut this shit down was Diablo 4. Now that Blizzard knows their fanbase of rubes will pay extra for a headstart, expect to see this as the norm for all future releases.

    • @pahlimur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I’m at Disneyland with my family RN and we mainly came because this week was insanely cheap for hotels. My hotel basically touches the convention center and there is almost no one here for blizzcon. It’s dying.

      The conversations I’ve overheard are so sad. They all justify simping for blizzard like addicts. So much random misogyny too.

      I used to love blizzard games but just the people I’ve listened to concern me.

    • Fox
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      It started long before. I remember boycotting d3 when the auction house came out and i stopped wow a decade ago because you are paying monthly for a savegame plus microtransactions.

      I can buy way better indie games for that price or keep playing guild wars 2 which has no sub.

    • @Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      442 years ago

      You’re taking about wow. That’s like telling a junkie not to buy their next fix.

        • @Evotech@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Just keep it to one character. FFXIV gates your reward endgame. You can’t just farm as much as you want.

          But if you start running multiple high level characters you have a problem.

      • @PM_ME_YOUR_ZOD_RUNES@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        Tell me about it. This was a long time ago but I remember one of my friends couldn’t even go a day without doing his dailies. He wasn’t even interested in WoW anymore, he was playing a bunch of other games. But he absolutely had to login every day just to do his dailies then log out and play the game he actually wanted to play.

        This went on for months. When we asked him why, he would just say he didn’t want to miss out and fall behind. Bro, you aren’t even interested in the game anymore…

        • @Neil@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          262 years ago

          When i was a teenager I played for legitimately 15 hours at least per day. I wasted my life for two years on that game. It was absolutely all I cared about. I missed being there for my grandfather’s death. I decided to play instead of sitting with my dog that had a herniated disc in his back (had to be put down the next day) and plenty of other life events. I feel like a piece of shit looking back on it, but it was a real addiction.

          Then one day my stupid little character was standing in Orgrimmar and I realized I had nothing left to do, and it was all just a waste of time. I don’t play games anymore. To some people they are fun time wasters, but to people like me they are a disease.

          • @Jerkface@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            92 years ago

            I just wanted to show some appreciation for sharing your experience. Speaking candidly about difficult subjects really can help people.

        • @_dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          This is what I’ve been doing with Eve Online for about 10 years. I login every couple months just to make sure my training queue isn’t empty. I don’t even know how to pilot any of the ships I’m trained in now.

  • Metal Zealot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    242 years ago

    Poor Blizzard, they must be failing on hard times, after being bought for 69 billion dollars

  • @Bricked@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 years ago

    Who pre purchases this early? The release date is “on or before December 31, 2024. Lol

      • @mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        152 years ago

        Business model. Legislating the fucking business model.

        Jesus fuck, what is it about this industry that makes people flip out about any sort of consumer protection? You know this is fucked up. You know “just don’t buy it!” will never help. What other possible solution do you imagine, besides telling companies to just sell a product, without any exorbitant double-dipping?

        • @bogdugg@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          You know this is fucked up.

          I don’t see the issue to be honest. It’s three days… How is it substantially different from somebody waiting 3 months for the price to go down even more? What are you protecting against?

          • @tal@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I don’t see the issue to be honest.

            I think it’s fine too, for the general case of video games. If someone wants to pay some premium, several times a game’s price to get access a couple days or a week early, I mean, I sure as hell am not going to pay it, but if some people do and are willing to bear a larger portion of the development costs, fine. It’s not like I would have noticed or cared if a game’s release date was a week later. Besides, I’m going to wait for reviews to come out anyway.

            I’ll also add that I’m not gonna get “premium” editions with some plastic doodads or artbooks or whatever, but there are clearly people who are willing to do that. If a game publisher wants to make the offer and someone else is willing to accept, I mean, okay, whatever makes them happy.

            That being said, WoW is an MMO, and that does introduce different dynamics. I don’t play it, so I don’t know the specifics there. Like, a guild cannot play together if all of its members aren’t together at the same time, and maybe that puts pressure on all the members to buy early. It also sounds like there are some self-imposed challenges to try to be the first person to do various things, and I guess that there could be a pay-to-win element in that sense. Frankly, I don’t find doing that sort of thing to be much fun, but I suppose for people who do, maybe it’d be an issue. Maybe there’s something specific to WoW that makes it matter more than a typical video game there.

            I think that in general, a lot of video game players would be a lot happier if they obsessed less about getting things exactly on release dates. I mean, the patientgamers crowd waits for at least a year before they look at a game. I wouldn’t go quite that far myself, but they still have fun playing games.

            • @Khotetsu@lib.lgbt
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 years ago

              WoW has historically worked on a daily limit to progression model for the endgame, so the 3 day early access is potentially a 3 day permanent boost for the people who buy it. I would imagine competitive raiders going for world first and “clearing hard difficulty versions of raids while they’re current content” achievements and their related rewards will be essentially mandated to buy it.

              As for gamers obsessing over things at launch, I wish it were different, but I think of it like movies or TV shows. If you go and watch a movie a year after it came out, nobody is gonna be talking about it anymore. And for some people, that social buzz around a new piece of media is half the fun. Playing a game and talking about it with your friends, the sense of discovery finding things out before you can just look it up on some wiki site, etc.

            • @bogdugg@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Yes, but presumably the order of magnitude (waiting substantially longer) would be worse but you’re arguing the opposite… Why is waiting longer for a price cut better?

              • @mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                Ohhh, that’s a completely different angle than I thought you were going for.

                It’s still ridiculous, though.

                Price drops exist to encourage new people to pay. People who would not otherwise buy the thing, buy the thing. But - anyone who pays an exorbitant amount up-front, for a game with a monthly subscription, three days early, was fucking obviously going to buy the thing, full-price, day-of. This is just gouging. This is seeing how little they can offer, in exchange for completely arbitrary quantities of money.

                If they offered a sliding scale where the price doubles for every extra day of early access - some addict with more money than sense may well drop tens thousand dollars, for an extra week. Which is obviously fucking nonsense. Please tell me you understand price and value are different concepts, and they can align, or they can not. Ten thousand dollars for one week of a game that costs ten dollars a month is complete absurdity, rivaled only by games charging more than the price of the entire full-price game for some stupid item inside that game.

                That exploitation of irrational decision-making doesn’t begin at ten thousand dollars. Smaller-scale abuses of it are not better… just lesser.

          • 👁️👄👁️
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 years ago

            We need to also legislate in game transactions so you can’t get scammed in RuneScape anymore

            • @mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              Runescape’s real-money transactions should absolutely be illegal.

              The fact they had to limit people to spending thousands of dollars per week - for fucking Runescape - is a giant flashing red light. In no universe is any public MMO worth ten thousand dollars per year. But that’s the kind of spending all games with real-money charges actively pursue.

              If we allow this to continue there will be nothing else.

        • blazera
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          the business model of…charging too much money? No, I dont have any issue with this. I have a lot of issues with Blizzard, but this ain’t on the list. It sounds like a smart way to alleviate expansion launch server burden, giving both a much better experience for some, and an improved launch for the rest.

          • @mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            … it’s a subscription service! They already get a shitload of money, every single month. Don’t bemoan their server costs. That’s what you’re already paying for!

            • blazera
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              I didnt say server costs, I said server burden. Long queue times on launch day, server crashes, very unevenly distributed server load when everyone is in the same area at the start. I remember FF14’s latest expansion was so bad, they completely halted sales of it. Forget too expensive, there was no price, you could not buy it if you were late.

              You dont have to pay $90, because you dont have to buy this early access. you dont have to buy the regular access. You are not entitled to this game as a human right, the developers didnt have to make this game, and they dont have to let you play it for whatever price you want. They get to decide the price.

              • @mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Hair-splitting. They have your money already. Services breaking down is not a problem solved by charging more - as you point out, for FF14. Charging more than the price of an entire new game, for three fucking days of opt-in beta testing, is completely absurd.

                Any form of taking your money for bullshit is reducing how much you can spend on things that matter. This ultracapitalist zeal for equating price and value only makes a lick of sense if it’s rational people making informed decisions - and there’s a thousand other ways we identify and forbid irrational uses of money.

                Outright confidence scams have seen victims come back with more money, thinking it’ll work out this time. Revenue alone absolves nothing.

                • blazera
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 years ago

                  Yeah, charging more is a very common way to alleviate service congestion, like amusement parks. They have the same sort of early access for more money deals. or very popular dine in restaurants, concerts, anything where capacity is a concern really.

                  Any form of taking your money

                  They are not taking anything, they do not have access to your wallet or your bank account. You can choose to give them your money. No one is making you, you have all of your money to spend on things that matter. If this doesnt matter to you? Dont have to spend a cent on it. Make your own MMO and charge less for it.

        • @anon232@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I dont get your point about “Just don’t buy it” not working.

          If consumers didnt think it was a fair price, then they wouldn’t buy it. People can live without a videogame, it’s not like this is a big pharma company raising prices on a life-saving drug.

      • @theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Try this on for size. Split them up, make them worker owned, or strip their IP and open source it. Send a message that anti consumer behavior is dangerous - that your investments could go to zero.

        Blizzard and Activision stood up there at the ftc and promised their merger would lead to better products at better prices for customers. Their customers overwhelmingly disagree. Microsoft and Activision/Blizzard said the same. It’s all worse and more expensive.

        Companies exist for people, not the other way around. They don’t have rights, they don’t have feelings, and if we do nothing everything we love will turn to shit.

        We’re in the endgame. Companies are cannibalizing themselves and each other to desperately extend their profit growth for one more quarter. Not to mention, they do that by squeezing their customers just a little harder from all sides

        We need rules and boundaries to the game, or this becomes the only workable playstyle for the board of every publicly traded corporation. We’re going to crash - we’ve colonized the whole world (or at least every place with resources highly profitable to extract). The rate of growth can’t increase - new markets and technologies will open up areas for growth now and then, but certainly not quarterly. Cannibalizing existing industries is going pretty damn fast, and either we stop it now or we stop it once everything is terrible and our technology sucks.

        Either way, we’re going to have to tackle climate change and inequality…

        • blazera
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          You seem to be ranting about something else entirely, we’re talking about an announced price for a game

            • blazera
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Sure. See, im not gonna buy this game, and Im gonna still have my $90 dollars.

              Someone else who does want that early access for $90 will get what they want.

              • @theneverfox@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                02 years ago

                That’s not even you voting with your wallet. That’s just you not buying a thing because it’s too expensive. That’s an example of price elasticity

                Voting with your wallet is this flawed concept that consumers can control companies through individuals boycotting their products.

                For example, I uninstalled hearthstone and quit Blizzard along with many others back when they let China censor a US esports player who commented on Hong Kong protests. But now I wouldn’t buy anyways, because their games suck and their payment schemes are obscene

                All they know is they lost n customers in that time period, and failed to recover m

                • blazera
                  link
                  fedilink
                  02 years ago

                  That’s just you not buying a thing because it’s too expensive.

                  yeah, that’s what Im doing. I am not hurt in anyway by not buying this thing, no one is making me buy it. That is an option for literally everyone, no one has to buy it. Im not a protesting activist trying to change Blizzard, Im simply not affected by this. The only people that are, are people that want to pay $90 for early access. If they dont want to, nobody is making them.

    • @gerryflap@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      I’m all for legislation to fix scummy practices in areas where something is essential, i.e. transport, connectivity, food, etc. Or to counter predatory practices like gambling or lootboxes that prey on addicts or children. But in this case I feel like it’d be a bit too much. Nobody needs WoW, nor is it really (in my opinion) preying on addicts in the same way as gambling or lootboxes. If enough people are willing to pay such a ridiculous amount of money, then apparently this is really the value.

      • @mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        ‘Exploiting people over nothing important is better, actually’ is a weird take.

        ‘If it sells it can’t be wrong’ is just fucking awful.

        • @anon232@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Governments shouldn’t tell companies what value their products have. Consumers should simply not buy the product if they dont consider it a fair value.

          • @mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Consumers should simply not buy the product if they dont consider it a fair value.

            Does that work?

            Think long and hard about your answer. Does that, in fact, have the effect you insist it must? Or are there abundant counterexamples, where greedy horseshit makes bank for negligible value?

            • Chozo
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Consumers should simply not buy the product if they dont consider it a fair value.

              Does that work?

              Yes, it works. Source: Me, I don’t consider WoW’s costs to be a fair value for my time and interests, and have not bought their products or services.

              It was really tough, though. I had to really fight my credit card who was just begging to be spent on WoW. But I pulled through.

        • 👁️👄👁️
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          This isn’t a law about money, you’re proposing a law because a game is charging for early access lol. That is beyond stupid.

              • @mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 years ago

                Stop lying to me about my own comments, god dammit.

                I am talking about how this product is sold. At no point did I propose not selling it. That’s just the absurd extreme you lot always make up, whenever someone suggests a specific and recent business model is exploitative greedy horseshit.

                I want games sold.

                What’s happening instead - the status quo you’re sloppily defending - is having games treated as bottomless pits where you can throw all your money, for asymptotically smaller fractions of content that’s already in the game. Or being a subscription service that also demands too much fucking money up-front, as if it was a concrete product being sold anew - and offering a bottomless pit where you can throw all your money.

                That shit is what’s happening to every game. Every genre has this. Every platform has this. Single-player games have this. It is the dominant strategy. Everyone scoffing ‘just don’t buy it!’ has seen their glib advice accomplish precisely dick. If we allow this to continue, there will be nothing else. Only legislation will fix this.

                • 👁️👄👁️
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  22 years ago

                  Early access is a product. Your comment is asking for laws to prevent this product from existing. You are asking for early access products to be illegal. Your comment is literally that stupid.

    • Chozo
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      What would this sort of legislation look like to you?

        • Chozo
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          So wait, are developers supposed to labor for free then? I’m not sure how that’s even close to being feasible in any scenario.

            • Chozo
              link
              fedilink
              42 years ago

              You literally said “no recurring costs” (subscription) and “no up-front costs” (price). I’m not sure what other takeaway I was supposed to have from that comment.

              Either way, it still sounds like you’re expecting developers to work for free, so that you can play video games without paying for them. That’s a really weird sense of entitlement, imo.

              • @mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 years ago

                No recurring costs FOR PRODUCTS.

                No up-front fees FOR SERVICES.

                Jesus! This subject invites the most aggressively poor reading comprehension of any topic on the internet.

                My entire fucking argument is JUST SELL GAMES, and people will bend over inside-out to find some way to scoff ‘you want it for free.’ Because apparently that’s the only position you’re prepared to deal with, y’might as well pretend that’s what’s happening.

                • Chozo
                  link
                  fedilink
                  32 years ago

                  I really don’t understand what difference “products” or “services” is supposed to make in this argument, though. Many games these days are a service, a fact which is inherently true for an MMO like WoW. MMOs require active and ongoing development and support in order to function. That’s just the nature of that type of game.

                  If you want single-player, offline games that only require a one-time purchase, those still exist. But WoW is not that game, and has no intention to ever be, nor do the players have any expectation that it would operate in such a manner.

                  Maybe instead of getting defensive, you could just clarify wtf you’re talking about, or at least take into consideration the context of live-service games, which is what this discussion is specifically about.

  • JokeDeity
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    What I don’t get is what made 2023 the year of the cut brakes? Seems like every corporation has decided to just go full fucking tilt on pushing their consumers to the edge of what they’re willing to put up with and they have ZERO shame about any of it.

    • @1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Profits going down I guess. People save money when inflation is crazy, and if the company profits go down, their stocks go down also. If that happens, leadership may be replaced etc etc.

      Ive cancelled most of my subs because they didn’t even provide enough value before the price hikes.

      So the people who remain and who are fine with paying YouTube or Netflix, they will have to pay more to support higher profits.

      Probably in 2030, people will both pay and watch lots of ads since that gives maximum profits. Pretty much how cable TV went.

    • @Kurros@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      I agree with regards to other studios but, activision blizzard has had no shame for a while, not a new thing at all.

    • Guy Ingonito
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      High consumer spending keeping the economy afloat against the predicted recession that never materialized. Companies figured they could start charging more and get away with it.

            • @Paradachshund@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              The company will, but from what I’ve seen the decision makers find ways to ensure they still get paid just as much or nearly as much, usually by laying people off and screwing over customers even more.

              These companies are purely short term focused. They don’t look to the long term and they don’t care about the company’s stability far into the future. It’s all about hitting the next financial target no matter what.

              • im sorry i broke the code
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                Yeah but if you enter a recession, your earnings will be much less. Even if you fire most of your staff, you won’t earn shit anyway.

                So causing a recession seems like a very dumb idea

                • @Paradachshund@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 years ago

                  I agree with you, but from what I’ve seen large corporations don’t. That’s all I can say, and this is all just anecdotal.

  • @qwertyWarlord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    Oh who cares anymore. Blizzard is going to do it, the players are going to lap it up with a smile. Just let it be and move on if it’s not for you

  • SmokeyDope
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Can’t wait for them do do it anyways and all the fans cave in because ‘muh social escapism’ gamers have some of the weakest spines, the most important point of boycotting g isn’t being loud and whiney its to NOT BUY THE PRODUCT FOR FUCKS SAKE.

  • nlm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 years ago

    I just can’t help feeling that this is a tad overblown…

    I’m going to buy the expansion and sure it would be nice to be able to play it as soon as possible but I don’t see myself paying extra for that

    I dont have a problem with people wanting to though.

    • @lorty@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      You don’t see the problem with people getting into a new expansion early?

      • nlm
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        Sure, it would’ve been better if they didn’t add a three days head start but I still don’t really think it’s quite the catastrophy everyone makes it out to be.

        It just won’t affect me in any way. I don’t rush to max level, don’t care for world’s first and so on.

        So, meh, it just doesn’t feel like it’s THAT big a deal.

    • Chaotic Entropy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I did immediately think “wait what are Digital Extremes up to…?”, before seeing WoW.