So this is some bollocks. Guess I’ll be cancelling our plan since it’s only used by two of us.

Current price $17.99/month, new price $32.99/month.

If they boiled the frog better I would probably have accepted a $5/month price rise, and then another later… But close to doubling in one go is a no from me dawg.

Thank you for being a loyal member throughout our journey. We created YouTube Premium so that you could enjoy all the videos and music you love without interruptions.‌

To continue delivering great service and features, we are increasing the YouTube Premium family plan price to A$32.99/month. We don’t make these decisions lightly, and this update will allow us to continue to improve YouTube Premium and support the creators and artists you watch on YouTube. This is the first ever price increase for your subscription.

Links to cancellation etc: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/12400348?sjid=6028684095030617608-AP

  • @bestusername@aussie.zoneM
    link
    fedilink
    812 years ago

    Got the same bullshit email, total dick move by Google and I’ll be cancelling. It’s just pure greed.

    I’m be exploring the ad blocking and/or VPN options.

    Google need to separate YouTube and Music.

      • @bestusername@aussie.zoneM
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        Well aware of those apps, installed that yesterday on my phone and Smarttube on the media player, could still end up blocked by Google.

        • @Anamnesis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          In my experience Smart Tube for my Google tv is already blocked. Updated to the latest version and I still can’t sign in with it. The code for activating the device never appears.

          • @bestusername@aussie.zoneM
            link
            fedilink
            152 years ago

            You might not have the latest version, that was a known bug and fixed yesterday.

            I was able to sign in yesterday after updating.

            • I’ve been using newpipe for android for several years.

              It’s great. One thing I’ve learned about these apps though is that they’re brittle. Expect them to break, sometimes several times a month. That said, there’s never been a case where I’ve noticed it break but a patch wasn’t already released. The thing is, repo’s like f-droid often aren’t up to date. Much better to get the release from the source.

    • @cybersandwich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      Google need to separate YouTube and Music.

      I actually think they need to go the other way with it. Increase the value proposition by adding more features to it. Include more drive space, Google one, etc.

      A lot of people are upset because they haven’t added any additional value to YouTube and are now just hiking the rents. If they threw in, more products and services to the bundle it’s a more compelling offering. I’d pay if it got me unlimited data on Google Fi, Google one with 200GB of storage, yt premium, I guess yt music? (I pay for prime music RN), and maybe some collab space/compute.

      • @whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        This is just the cable model. You want one channel (Youtube in this analogy) so you have to pay for the 200 channel package because that’s the only place it is even though you don’t want the other 199 channels.

        If they threw in all of the things you said and still hiked the price, I’d still bail because not only do I not have any desire for those services, I actively want to avoid using many Google products as I can. The reality for me would be the same as including nothing and hiking the price, because I will still see no value from it.

      • @bestusername@aussie.zoneM
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        Yeah nah buddy.

        I only have YouTube Premium/Red because it came free with Play Music, then they killed that and we all jumped to Spotify because it was/is so much better and kept our subscription just for ad-free YouTube.

        If they seperate YouTube from YouTube Music, YouTube Music would die in seconds. The app sucks, having it linked to YouTube sucks, they know this.

      • @calcopiritus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        I don’t want none of those “features”, I just want to browse YouTube without ads. Right now I have to choose, pay more than 100€/year to get it without trouble, or install an adblocker and also not have ads, but with the slim chance that YouTube will implement an anti-adblocker that will last a few days. I’ll just install the adblocker.

        If they just sold an “ad-free YouTube” instead of “premium YouTube” for half (or third) the price I might consider it, since I wouldn’t have to worry ever again. I won’t pay more than 100€/year just so I can get a single feature of a huge pack of features I don’t need or want.

      • @Salvo@aussie.zone
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        What you are describing is similar to Apple One. Music and Storage, Apple Arcade, AppleTV+, News and Fitness+. The thing is, Apple also charge these things separately too, but if you just want two of them, you can just select two of them. The bundle is priced in such a way that it is more cost effective to get them bundled. The cost of the smaller bundle (without News or Fitness+) is much cheaper than what Google is asking for YouTube Premium.

        I would have no interest in Googles other services, I hardly trust them with my YouTube viewing habits. I’m not going to trust them to store my files, read my email, log my search history, even if I do pay them for the privilege.

  • Pyr
    link
    fedilink
    622 years ago

    Jesus, how do they justify that price?

    They charge more than Netflix yet they don’t even make any of their own content?

    • @ChronosWing@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      It’s because you also get youtube music streaming included with it. If netflix had its own music streaming service bundled in their prices would be even higher than they are now.

      • @aksdb@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        Music might really be their main problem. Basically every video has some music in it. If not in the foreground, then in the background. Even game soundtracks in Let’s Plays are often under license. So the moment someone plays any such video, the content mafia comes around the corner with their baseball bats in hand collecting their tolls.

        So I assume if they have to pay for music any way, they figured they might as well include a tailored music listening experience with Premium.

          • @aksdb@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            My point was: they likely have to pay for licensed music to the content mafia, so they cannot really offer anything without including music in the pricing.

    • @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Not apologizing for them: they’re assholes. But I expect they have more traffic. Still not saying they’re right.

  • @Yerbouti@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    502 years ago

    I’m always amaze by the fact that all these streaming platform do is give you access to others content ( they dont create shit), but they get to keep 98.7% of the revenue, because.

    • Palacegalleryratio [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      192 years ago

      In this industry the “means of production” = “hosting and distribution platform and servers”. If you’ve got no way of hosting your content and putting it in front of people, your content may as well not exist. In much the same way an actor needs a theatre.

      So as per any capitalist industry, those that own the means of production (I.e. google with YouTube) exploit its workers (content creators) to generate profit in the same way a steel mill owner gets to keep the profits from his steel mill despite the fact that the owner never creates any steel ingots themselves.

      • @Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        Yeah people don’t notice that the Internet used to be like going over to a friend’s house who had the cool stuff which over time became niche shops.
        Rules, regulations and restrictions, slowly put up more and more stops for simple small people to enter the space and left only large companies in it’s place. Some of this by consumers own demand for more.

        So here we are, the Internet just the next space for capitalism and having every last scrap of revenue squeezed from it while those with capital complain they need the next big invention to exploit as they run out of space and room to grow and things to consume. Each day pushing more towards their pockets and less towards the rest of us.

        I just want small curators back. Small groups filling niches instead of massive “creators” who simply consume as much as possible to regurgitate it back at their audience.

        • @whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          I think you’re mostly correct, but I slightly disagree on this part:

          Rules, regulations and restrictions, slowly put up more and more stops for simple small people to enter the space

          I think the reality is that convenience simply trumped out. As much as we can see now that allowing the internet to coalesce into a handful of silos, or often only 1-2 silos as is the case with Youtube, years ago the major value they provided was that you could simply go there and find the content. Reddit’s demise reminded me of this more than anything else. I was a daily visitor for quite an array of topics for over a decade. When they decided to fully fuck up the site and I left, I found myself having to think about which of those content sources I wanted to replace and what I’d want to replace them with, and as much as it would be cool for that all to just be “lemmy” the reality is that I now am looking at far more RSS feeds, discord servers, mastodon servers, etc.

          I also think that there is a phenomenon that is a bit more insidious at play, and that’s that most of these services are funded by VC or these massive companies and don’t make money for years or even a decade or more until they’ve consolidated the market to basically just them and they can charge whatever they feel like. Youtube follows this pattern. Even after Google’s acquisition, it was quite a while before YouTube became even break-even as they gobbled up the market for this type of thing. VC/Google can sink billions into infrastructure without turning a profit until the market is basically just Youtube, and then all of a sudden we get Adblock crackdowns and near doubling of Premium rates. The only place that might compete with Youtube at this point is probably Apple or Amazon mostly because they’re the only companies that can say “we’re going to lose hundreds of millions or billions for at least a decade.”

          Ultimately, I think this is going to be the major lesson from about 2000-2020. As consumers, we should be extremely mistrusting of businesses where we can’t understand how they make money, because usually that just means that the way they make money is to basically monopolize the market and then really fuck us.

          • @Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            I fully agree and still think that regulations to a degree do impact the ability for others to join in spaces. The world is full of nuance and as always it’s a bit of A & B and C through fucking Z as well in small amounts.

            Convenience has let people grow complacent to companies doing whatever which gives us now when the reaper has come to collect and wants more money since they have nothing else to focus on.

            But think of it also as making a hotdog. There are rules that are super necessary and helpful. You want it made with good ingredients and not rodent and in a kitchen that is clean and inspected every so often. But imagine if they made a requirement for size and shape, stated that each hotdog must be measured by an IR camera and nuked by gamma radiation to be sold. Suddenly the only people that can sell hotdogs retail are ones that can afford plutonium and very expensive equipment.

            Not a huge issue cause those hotdogs last longer and are reliable but there was literally a law saying all platforms must be responsible for every single comment on their platform and several of them said they would turn off comments.
            With server costs, bandwidth costs, registration and more eventually the people that can afford to meet those minimum requirements are the ones who already have the money to do so. The walls get built and those inside make sure they stay safe of others impact.

            They can only do that while people have no interest in leaving the walled garden, and they assist in building them. It seems to just be how people interact with their world. Ignorant. And I say that without prejudice cause it lets them be happy but the horrors will come out of nowhere to them.

            • @whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              Fair, I also didn’t realize that I was replying in an Aussie specific community, so this part:

              but there was literally a law saying all platforms must be responsible for every single comment on their platform and several of them said they would turn off comments.

              makes it make more sense to me why you said that in your original comment. Over here (US) there is very little regulation of these platforms. Basically, they can’t knowingly host CSAM, and they have to respond to DMCA requests. The DCMA is basically just “take down copyrighted material when a right’s holder complains.” We have a carve out called section 230 that really lets companies not have much responsibility for the content they host. So in the US’s case when it comes to these things going back to the hot dog analogy, our tech companies only responsibility is along the lines of not explicitly encouraging employees to allow rodents, or even to police for rodents, it’s basically just if the right people report rodents they have to do something about it.

              So in the case of YouTube, for example, I and most other people who know how to build websites can make a site that hosts video fairly easily. Because regs here are so lax, all I really need to do is explicitly state that CSAM/copyright materials aren’t allowed, do a shockingly small amount of work to automatically take it down when reported. Laws over here aren’t really the barrier.

        • Most creators worth watching will be making their work available beyond Youtube, and if they aren’t then it’s worth contacting them.

    • space_comrade [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 years ago

      These platforms are basically just one step removed from pure landlordism. Same goes for Uber and similar shit. The platforms themselves are usually cheap to maintain, the exception here might be Youtube since it does gobble up a whole lot of bandwidth and storage but come on nobody streams $10 worth of bandwidth a month.

      • flan [they/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        The platforms themselves are usually cheap to maintain

        ?? video is extremely intensive in terms of storage, bandwidth, and compute needs. There are also very few people in the world who know how to work on these things so they’re expensive to hire. These platforms are anything but cheap to run, there’s a reason they all go all in on ads and subscriptions.

    • @Rednax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I will not justify the price increase of this post, but the high margins kinda do make sense to me.

      The average profit that youtube makes on a gigabyte worth of video data, is much much lower than that 98.7%. There is such a vast amount of random crap being uploaded, that the content creators that actually generate views, hence revenue, must bear a huge sinkhole of costs for youtube. The same holds for Twitch: streams with only a handfull of watchers cost Twitch money. But it is a double edged sword. Because the reason these content creators are as big as they are, is because they could start from nothing, and upload for free. The big guys support vast amounts of amateurs trying to become big. It is probably one of the most socialistic model we have in our current capitalistic market.

      That being said: Youtube is getting shittier in an attempt to sqeeze this model for extra profit.

      • @cjsolx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        There is such a vast amount of random crap being uploaded, that the content creators that actually generate views, hence revenue, must bear a huge sinkhole of costs for youtube.

        There are better ways around this than by doubling the price for everyone and continuing to allow unlimited BS uploads for free. They charge $1.99 for 100GB of storage for email and photos. I guess it never occurred to them to include a minor barrier like this that most legitimate aspiring content creators would be willing to pay but would stop randos posting 10 hour long videos in 4K.

      • cannache
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Interesting problem. Is it possible to trim copyright and pointless content, e.g. children’s movies, entertainment shorts with less than a certain number of views, which can be used as pointers to redirect to the original content?

  • @testgoatpleaseignore@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    472 years ago

    In the most recent update YouTube finally managed to put ads in my mobile app.

    I’ve been really enjoying it. Instead of watching garbage on YT at night, I’ve been reading books again.

    Thanks, youtube!

    • @Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      I’m reading this thread with lots of people saying they keep paying for premium because they watch so much YouTube, and fair play to them, it’s more convenient to pay

      But what the fuck are people actually watching?!?

      • @BzzBiotch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        As an avid YT watcher: lots of high quality food and cooking shows, music and concerts, science channels, space and spacefaring channels and of course regular entertainment. Enough to fill your whole day, if necessary. With no fucking ads at all. I love it! ❤️

      • @testgoatpleaseignore@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I watch 3 categories of things on YouTube, generally.

        1- music - absolutely not worth paying for or watching ads for, spotify is better for it in both paid and unpaid tiers.

        2- random bullshit food rating/comedy/fitness/entertaining influencer type garbage/comedians/etc, not worth paying for or watching ads for

        3- actual quality stuff like John Michael Godier, Event Horizon, Anton Petrov, Technology Connections, Breaking Taps, Sabine Hossenfelder, which are worth paying their creators for as much as anything I’d watch through paid subscription/TV.

      • @SolarNialamide@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        I watch a lot of long-form video essays about politics, economics, media analysis, and societal stuff like that, sketch or video game comedy, and some random hobby stuff, all by independent creators. I also watch stream vods on YouTube. Oh and asmr to fall asleep. I don’t want to watch ads obviously but it would be much more expensive to support everyone I watch on patreon, even if I only gave a dollar to every one. And I do want to support them financially because a lot of that long-form stuff literally takes weeks or months to make.

      • Instigate
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        This is what I don’t understand either - as someone who stopped using Youtube the day that they brought ads in (except for watching embedded videos elsewhere as they don’t have ads), I haven’t been exposed to the long-form enshittification others have experienced and so maybe that’s why I don’t get it, but who is using Youtube for hours on end and what are they watching? Is it just conspiracy theorists falling further and further down the rabbit hole? I really don’t know.

      • @CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        I use it every day. I watch videos that are i on a specific topic, and YouTube has lots of them. For now, my uBlock in Firefox works. I will not pay for Premium if they block me

  • Sphere
    link
    fedilink
    312 years ago

    It’s times like these when I’m glad I refused to even log into Google to view YouTube, let alone buy subscriptions. I also refuse to view downloading content (without logging in) that’s freely available to be viewed as piracy.

    These subscriptions are undoubtedly a rip-off. For those saying creators get a “cut”, there’s a reason why sites like Patreon exist. It’s substantially better for creators if you subscribe to them directly that way and get your videos from Patreon. Same with Nebula etc. If I really had to pay then I’d do that (and do already for some stuff that was never on YouTube anyway).

    You can get enough subs for the price of a YT premium to get plenty of content to watch, even if you don’t want to subvert Google. So there’s zero reason to throw money at them for this. None at all.

    • @lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      I am not saying I like YouTube, but they are actually one of the best when it comes to paying their creators.

      Pretty much every popular creator from other platforms (like tiktok) goes to YouTube once they are big and want to earn money.

      And yes of course they earn more on Patreon, but if I recall correctly most YouTubers get most of their money from YouTube, because they have their biggest audience.

      De-monitisation is a pretty huge problem for many though.

      • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        TikTok’s biggest problem is that it pays people through a very limited pool of money that shrinks the more people become a part of it. It’s pretty good pay if you live in a poorer country but it’s pennies if you live in a developed one. Twitch is better but still lags behind Youtube. Facebook is said to pay as much if not a little more than Youtube but it’s also much easier to get demonetized or have your content removed on there than Youtube.

  • roguetrick
    link
    fedilink
    30
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I’m curious what’s driving this revenue rush at Alphabet. It almost feels like something internal, like they’re trying to make it actually self sufficient based on cloud pricing.

    • @galoisghost@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      212 years ago

      It’s not just Alphabet it’s cloud based companies across the board and basically VC money is drying up because it can be secured on 0% interest loans anymore

      • roguetrick
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        Alphabet would be less impacted by interest rates or VC money since they’re a megacorp. I’m curious if for them they are afraid of not being competitive enough if they get trust busted.

    • Seraphin 🐬
      link
      fedilink
      172 years ago

      It’s happening across a lot of industries, especially tech. During covid line went up very fast. Post-covid line stopped going up fast, but companies are desperate to keep it going up fast. Otherwise it would count as a slowdown in year-on-year growth and we can never ever have that (/s).

      • @been_jamming@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        Companies then: Let’s make money!

        Companies now: Let’s make more money faster! Our graph of profit must concave up!

        Companies 100 years from now: Let’s increase the rate at which the rate at which our growth in profit increases increases!

    • skribe
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I’m expecting YT to be spun off/sold within a year or so.

      • roguetrick
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        I don’t think it’ll happen willingly. They don’t want it to be a drain on their cloud business and they don’t want it to use AWS either.

    • @krogoth@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      342 years ago

      I’m never going to shed any tears for Google losing revenue, and I’ve got no issues with people using adblockers etc. That said, I think saying that not being able to understand why people pay for it risks being a bit narrow minded.

      Paying for things that you use shouldn’t be seen as some abherrent action. If you watch an hour of YouTube a day on average that’s still less than a buck an hour even with the price hike. I imagine some folks also like the convenience of being able to just use the official aps without fucking around, particularly if they have iPhones.

      Pay for premium, or watch ads, or get into the ad-avoidance arms race, or stop using YouTube. It doesn’t bother me which one people choose. But this opinion that some folks seem to have that they are for some reason entitled to gratis, ad-free video streaming is so bizarre.

      • @whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        Indeed, and as I posted elsewhere these days I’m far less likely to buy into a product where it’s not clear how money is being made as was the case for Youtube and the last decade. It’s only been free and easily ad-blockable for this long because the Silicon Valley way is to make a product that really can’t exist on it’s own but survives due to the deep pockets of the company or VC until it dominates the market and then turn the screws. Tie this to the fact these are all publicly traded and there is never enough growth, and we get here.

        This is why enshittification is suddenly top of mind for everyone. For the last couple of decades, we’ve been enjoying the fruits of this model and we’re now reaching the part where everything has consolidated and the surviving companies start jacking up prices and so forth. Netflix, Uber, Amazon, Reddit, Google/Youtube, Instagram, Twitter, etc have all done this in one way or another.

        But this opinion that some folks seem to have that they are for some reason entitled to gratis, ad-free video streaming is so bizarre.

        Agreed, and further if a company today presented this as their model, I would be skeptical as hell and unlikely to even try the service.

        That said, I’m not losing any tears for Google. I’m in the US so not subject to this price increase, and while I do pay for Premium and find a lot of value in the service, I wouldn’t be able to tolerate a near doubling in price.

        • @krogoth@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          Those are some good points, and I think what you’ve highlighted is probably a part of the reason why so many people seem to have the “YouTube should be free” reaction. They literally cannot remember a time before VC money was paying for a lot of services on their behalf.

    • @Sydius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      I watch a large, large amount of content on YouTube. For me, it’s easily worth it, but I also have to mention that I used a VPN to subscribe in a country where the prices are cheaper, and most likely would not pay the “real” price.

      This also means that I have no real idea about the current ad situation.

      Still, I know how expensive hosting gets, and there are no real alternatives to Google. Amazon and Microsoft can do it, but even if they launch a service, they need creators on it, and, more importantly, they need users. YouTube had more than a decade to establish itself. Any new platform needs a few years to get users, and it will lose money every second of that time.

      You have your smaller platforms, but they need to survive as well, and not everyone is willing to pay a monthly price to access it. Nebula lives as long as there are users willing to pay for it. Floatplane requires a subscription as well. Both platforms only host a limited number of creators.

      In the video hosting business, unfortunately, there are no bad guys. I can understand why no one wants to watch the same 30 second long ads, 3-4 at a time, 2 times a video. I also understand the platforms that want to survive, and make a profit. Unfortunately, adblocks, as much as necessary, are the cause of the problem as well.

      • @okamiueru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        For me, it’s easily worth it, but I also have to mention that I used a VPN to subscribe in a country where the prices are cheaper, and most likely would not pay the “real” price.

        So it’s not worth it. Gotcha.

    • @beerclue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      We are a family of five who consume a lot of youtube, at home and on the go. I subscribed initially for YouTube Music, YouTube benefits were just an add on. I commute and there are areas with no phone coverage, so I liked the option to download videos offline (yes, I know there are 3rd party apps that can do that).

      Now YT Music is the least used app, and a lot of YT is used on the TV. Sure, there are a bunch of alternative apps, VPNs, ad-blockers etc, and I could make it work. But I’m not sure my wife and kids will use them… Is there something that works on an Android TV?

      I got the email telling me the price will change from 18€ to 24€/month, and I am still considering it…

    • FireWire400
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Apparently YouTube makes little to no money so of course they have to raise prices and go after ad blocker users. /s

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 years ago

    I can’t blame them. The fight to block adblockers is an expensive one, and they went all in on the fight.

    Asshats.

  • YⓄ乙
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 years ago

    People saying I’ll cancel will not cancel. I’ve seen so many corp simps in the last few years that I lost faith in humanity

      • @soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        I haven’t seen any in this thread or any of the other social media conversations I have online.

        Maybe I’m bubbled but everyone seems to be shitting on Google. Can you link me to 3-4 of these bootlicker comments please? I’m interested in what you’re seeing

        • YⓄ乙
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          The power is in the hands of consumers and not the other way around. All we need to do is educate the consumers and see how fast google breaks.

    • @CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      “I will never set foot in this shop again!!”, a customer said to me when we couldn’t refund her thing because she broke it and it was her fault.

      A couple of days later…

  • @retro@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    192 years ago

    All prices seem to be going up around the board. I just got an email saying my Turkish Family Plan (via VPN) is increasing from TRY ₺59.99 to TRY ₺115.99. That’s $3.29 to $6.36.

  • @webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 years ago
    1. selfhost jellyfin
    2. automatically download youtube videos based on a txt file with channel urls
    3. redirect youtube links to invidious for all other use case.
    4. never directly visit the youtube site ever again, depending on other service you use, no longer need a google account.
    5. no profit cause i never paid a dime but no regrets either.
    • @Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      102 years ago

      Lmao, that’s not gonna fly with my wife.

      The only reason I got premium is because she uses YouTube quite a bit and I’d rather pay than her having to deal with ads all day

      • @penquin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        If your only concern is ads then get any android box or a fire TV stick and install smarttubenext on it. It’s basically YouTube without the ads and with sponsorblock and dislikes showing.

      • @webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Depends on the use case. This setup really is to continue watching channels your subscribed towards but theres no search.

        You may want to look at invidious which is much more like an alternative front end with search and trending pages.

        Sometimes though when people are comfortable with the present it is of course entirely valid to decide that paying up is the least stressfull, best solution for your family. But never hurts to know that alternatives do exist.

    • @Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      What are you using to download videos? Youtube-dl hasn’t updated in a couple years now and didn’t seem to work anymore last I used it.

      • @webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Why wouldn’t it be?

        Its a youtube-dlp script that converts all videos into mp4 and puts them in a folder which is part of a Jellyfin library.

        Its strangely actually the most stable way things get added to my jellyfin because of how consistent the output format is.

    • @Drigo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      How do you deal with the increased storage usage of all the videos you download? Do you have some sort of auto delete after it’s watched or after some about of time?

      • @webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        On pc jellyfin allows you to delete the media straight from within the webinterface so il usually delete videos after watching. But because i use the same server like a nass i do have some space for videos i do want to keep.

        I am also rather picky on what goes on the list. Theres maybe 15 channels in their now, favorites i really don’t want to miss. I run a personal indivious client next to it with all my second tier and filler subscriptions.

          • @webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Honestly if you have absolutely no idea then replicating my exact setup might be a bit steep.

            Before i made the download script (which i can share if you ping me next week when i am back home) i already had a 24/7 Ubuntu server with docker running multiple containers like a small Minecraft server.

            You could replicate much of what i did on windows and a not always online machine but it may take some extra steps to get working.

            I also got much help from chatgpt-(4) the last year for all kinds of linux/docker/scripting questions, my total linux experience is less then 3 years.

            I recommended to start of trying to host invidious, which on itself could already be a full experience without requiring local storage or scripts.

            invidous selfhost installation guide (i use docker-compose)

            For any questions regarding docker i continuing to highly recommend chatgpt but remember its quality is entirely dependent on your ability to recognize “makes sense” versus “dangerously derailed bullshit”

            If you have this working then getting jellyfin to work in docker will be a breeze. Only step remaining would be using a script like mine to download the videos and save them in the library folder. And as mentioned once i am back home next week i’ll be happy to share it and explain further.

            • @Drigo@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              I haven’t even setup my jellyfin service yet, because of lack of time (family and work).

              But Iam very glad you took the time to write all this out, I’m currently looking to gathering as much knowledge as I can for the future.

              I’ll definitely write to you next week for the download script, if you want to share it

    • @ChuckEffingNorris@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      I have an android phone and an android TV so I see no ads. However I have an iPad which I take away and the ads make me sad.

      Is there any way to adblock YouTube on an iPad?

      • @Brahminman@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Safari has the hyperweb extension that does a pretty good job for me!

        Edit: hyperweb does a bunch of stuff, eliminating youtube ads is only a fraction of this extension

      • @TheGenuineGT@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Late, but maybe nextdns. I haven’t actually tried with YouTube on an iPhone/ipad, but I know they integrate pretty easily on Apple devices. Fairly customizable too with a free tier, just need to make a profile.

        • @JustARegularNerd@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I went down this route because I had an iPad 9th gen and I wanted to get more away from Apple for various reasons, ended up getting a Samsung tablet and don’t feel much better off at all. Granted, it’s an entry level 8" $200 tablet, but the touch screen is much worse (the bezels are so thin it’s difficult to hold without touching the sides of the touchscreen), the interface is way worse in my opinion, and while I’ve adb’d the shit out of most of the crapware that comes on it, installing a custom ROM voids the one year warranty and I know how my luck is, that the damn thing will die a week after I flash it, so it just feels even less private than an iPad.

          I actually bought it to watch YouTube and read articles in bed on something that was bigger than my phone but smaller than my current 10.2" Apple iPad, and I find myself just using my phone more anyway because it’s so clunky.

          Maybe better quality tablets (even the Pixel Tablet) are much better, but I really think the state of tablets on Android is terrible, whereas the experience is fairly polished on the side of Apple (although it took them another year to add features like the new lockscreens to iPadOS). I miss the days of when my Nexus 7 was current, and it worked really awesome for a good price.

          • @itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            oh damn, didn’t know that. I just knew that Firefox was installable on iOS, and extensions work great on Android, so I’d assume it’d be the same. But you’re right, apple locks browsers into using WebKit. That sucks