@compostgoblin@slrpnk.net to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agoISO 8601slrpnk.netimagemessage-square245arrow-up11.13Kfile-text
arrow-up11.13KimageISO 8601slrpnk.net@compostgoblin@slrpnk.net to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square245file-text
minus-square@missandry351@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•2 months agoNo! It’s the other way around, from largest to smallest is a mess and it makes no sense
minus-square@MapleMan@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish13•2 months agoIf you name files or other data with ISO 8601 then they’re always sorted chronologically when you go largest to smallest.
minus-square@modeler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink9•2 months agoI know, right! I’ve been campaigning for this for everyday numbers. For example, twenty seven should be written smallest first: 72. Likewise this year is 5202, and next year 6202. That way no-one’s going to be confused at all.
minus-square@Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglish4•2 months agoSo true, bestie! That’s why all the clocks in my house are formatted ss:mm:hh
No! It’s the other way around, from largest to smallest is a mess and it makes no sense
If you name files or other data with ISO 8601 then they’re always sorted chronologically when you go largest to smallest.
I know, right! I’ve been campaigning for this for everyday numbers. For example, twenty seven should be written smallest first: 72. Likewise this year is 5202, and next year 6202. That way no-one’s going to be confused at all.
What you said is stupid
So true, bestie! That’s why all the clocks in my house are formatted ss:mm:hh