@cm0002@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works • 3 months agoLife Hacklemmy.mlimagemessage-square59arrow-up1860cross-posted to: funny@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1860imageLife Hacklemmy.ml@cm0002@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works • 3 months agomessage-square59cross-posted to: funny@lemmy.ml
minus-square@OutlierBlue@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish38•3 months ago9/1 is approximately 8, for extremely large values of 8.
minus-square@somedev@aussie.zonelinkfedilink17•3 months agoFor that last one, how bad are we talking? I need to know soon, I have some important banking software I need to develop.
minus-square@prole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilink3•3 months agoIt depends on the scale of the thing you’re using it for.
minus-square@pacology@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish12•3 months agoHave you considered running for Indiana governor? You have the right mindset. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_pi_bill
minus-square@Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish8•3 months agoNah, the engineer probably designed it with a safety factor. You could probably even go 9/0 and be perfectly safe ;)
minus-square@humanspiral@lemmy.calinkfedilink4•3 months ago16/2 is an almost exact replacement for 8. OP’s name includes Fermat, and so he’s probably smarter than me though.
deleted by creator
9/1 is approximately 8, for extremely large values of 8.
Hello, fellow old nerd.
9/1 ≈ 8
For that last one, how bad are we talking? I need to know soon, I have some important banking software I need to develop.
deleted by creator
It depends on the scale of the thing you’re using it for.
Have you considered running for Indiana governor? You have the right mindset.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_pi_bill
Nah, the engineer probably designed it with a safety factor. You could probably even go 9/0 and be perfectly safe ;)
deleted by creator
Don’t cut corners
deleted by creator
16/2 is an almost exact replacement for 8. OP’s name includes Fermat, and so he’s probably smarter than me though.