no banana to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 1 month agoChoose a number, 1-5!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square443arrow-up1549
arrow-up1549imageChoose a number, 1-5!lemmy.worldno banana to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 1 month agomessage-square443
minus-squareUriel238 [all pronouns]linkfedilink35•1 month ago2, assuming the broad pommel is a counterweight. If it’s flimsy lightweight material then none of them.
minus-square@hansolo@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish3•1 month agoAll of this is exactly right. #2 is the least cringe-inducing because of the lumpy bottom. Is this fork thing an official diagnosis metric? Or just not yet?
minus-square@AA5B@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•edit-21 month ago2 has the best tines but that huge duckbill handle is a non-starter. 5 has the best handle
minus-square@Burninator05@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•1 month agoFive is out because its outer tines are curved. There is no reason for that and that is why I hate it. One, however, is the best. I find it eat slower (and often less) if my silverware isn’t the size of a pitchfork.
2, assuming the broad pommel is a counterweight. If it’s flimsy lightweight material then none of them.
Getting aboard the #2 train
Yeah, longest tines wins.
All of this is exactly right. #2 is the least cringe-inducing because of the lumpy bottom.
Is this fork thing an official diagnosis metric? Or just not yet?
2 has the best tines but that huge duckbill handle is a non-starter. 5 has the best handle
deleted by creator
Five is out because its outer tines are curved. There is no reason for that and that is why I hate it.
One, however, is the best. I find it eat slower (and often less) if my silverware isn’t the size of a pitchfork.