@tripper@lemmy.ca to Trippin' Through Time@lemmy.caEnglish • 3 months agoYouTubers in their thumbnailslemmy.caimagemessage-square49arrow-up1814
arrow-up1814imageYouTubers in their thumbnailslemmy.ca@tripper@lemmy.ca to Trippin' Through Time@lemmy.caEnglish • 3 months agomessage-square49
minus-square@samus12345@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish27•3 months agoI hate that useless “nobody:” Glad it went out of style. If nobody said nothing, then everybody said something. The still useless but correct way would be “everybody:”
minus-squarefederal reverselinkfedilinkEnglish13•3 months agoIt’s a shorthand for “nobody asked for this but [person/group] do it anyway:”
minus-square@samus12345@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish13•edit-23 months agoI know, it’s just very poorly done. You can remove it every single time and it changes nothing about the joke.
minus-squarefederal reverselinkfedilinkEnglish5•3 months agoBe that as it may, “everyone:” is not a good replacement.
minus-square@samus12345@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish4•3 months agoIt’s more accurate, but yes, they both suck.
minus-squareForeverComicallinkfedilinkEnglish4•3 months agoWas about to do that, saved me the crop thanks
I hate that useless “nobody:” Glad it went out of style. If nobody said nothing, then everybody said something. The still useless but correct way would be “everybody:”
It’s a shorthand for “nobody asked for this but [person/group] do it anyway:”
I know, it’s just very poorly done. You can remove it every single time and it changes nothing about the joke.
Be that as it may, “everyone:” is not a good replacement.
It’s more accurate, but yes, they both suck.
Perfection
Was about to do that, saved me the crop thanks