FundMECFS to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-23 months agoMove the Overton Windowlemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square241arrow-up11.86Kfile-text
arrow-up11.86KimageMove the Overton Windowlemmy.blahaj.zoneFundMECFS to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-23 months agomessage-square241file-text
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilinkEnglish2•3 months agothe fact you need to search indicates you may not be qualified to be having this discussion.
minus-square@Dagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoYou get funnier and funnier. I literally lol’d that one.
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilinkEnglish2•3 months agoif you don’t know about the most successful third party in America that never won an election, you should probably not be the one teaching about third parties
minus-square@Dagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoThis from the guy who needed ‘splitting the vote explained’ You just keep getting funnier and funnier. btw, uproarious laughter isn’t considered a sign of petulance. It means ‘sulky’
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-23 months ago This from the guy who needed ‘splitting the vote explained’ just because you insisted on linking your favorite think tank doesn’t mean anyone needed to see it.
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilinkEnglish2•3 months agocorrecting your assumptions is generosity, not petulance
minus-square@Dagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoSure, keep telling yourself whatever you need to. You’re a very smart person and a skilled debater; you have made a lot of people rethink their old ideas. You are talented and well-respected in your community. Need any more affirmations? After all the laughter you’ve given me, I feel like giving something back.
the fact you need to search indicates you may not be qualified to be having this discussion.
You get funnier and funnier. I literally lol’d that one.
if you don’t know about the most successful third party in America that never won an election, you should probably not be the one teaching about third parties
This from the guy who needed ‘splitting the vote explained’
You just keep getting funnier and funnier.
btw, uproarious laughter isn’t considered a sign of petulance. It means ‘sulky’
just because you insisted on linking your favorite think tank doesn’t mean anyone needed to see it.
Now who is acting petulant?
correcting your assumptions is generosity, not petulance
Sure, keep telling yourself whatever you need to.
You’re a very smart person and a skilled debater; you have made a lot of people rethink their old ideas.
You are talented and well-respected in your community.
Need any more affirmations?
After all the laughter you’ve given me, I feel like giving something back.