@cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 3 months agoJunior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.mlimagemessage-square54arrow-up1753cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1753imageJunior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.ml@cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 3 months agomessage-square54cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squareOrvornlinkfedilink85•3 months agoSomeone should invent some kind of database of syntax, like a… code
minus-square@heavydust@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink40•3 months agoBut it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
minus-square@peoplebeproblems@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish27•3 months agoThat’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
minus-squareNatanaellinkfedilink23•3 months agoHow to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
minus-square@maiskanzler@feddit.nllinkfedilink2•edit-23 months agoPeople could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.
minus-square@Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink11•3 months agoWe don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.
Someone should invent some kind of database of syntax, like a… code
But it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
That’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
How to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
People could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.
A codegrammar?
We don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.