• PonyOfWar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1023 months ago

      The article makes it pretty clear. Jobst always implied the lawsuit was over the cheating allegations, which wasn’t the case. He claimed in one of his videos that Mitchell drove another Youtuber to suicide by suing him and forcing him to pay a large sum of money. As it turns out, that Youtuber didn’t have to pay anything at all. The settlement was just to take his existing videos down and not make any further videos about Mitchell. Honestly seems justified to me and not a good look for Jobst.

        • @Dotcom@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          153 months ago

          No the dude did, and basically said in his final video that it was because of the lawsuits

          • PonyOfWar
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I don’t think that is true. In his final video (Source, trigger warning of course) he mentioned his failing health, chronic pain and a perceived betrayal by the speedrunning community. Not a word about the lawsuits in there.

            • @Dotcom@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              6
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I could be misremembering as I haven’t watched anything about it in a long while, maybe it was in a post? He kind of alluded to recent things caused financial hardships and with his health issues he couldn’t continue? I’ll have to watch the video again

              Edit - You were right, he said he had some financial hardships and health issues. Billy ultimately got no money from him, but I don’t think it’s a far leap to suggest lawyers fees may have been part of that hardship

              • @redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                103 months ago

                I mean, my money’s on you misremembering, or having that thought implanted by repeated coverage of Jobst claiming that to be the case. After all, any such statement would be Exhibit A in Jobst’s defense. Considering the results of the suit…I’m gonna guess such a statement doesn’t exist.