@cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 4 months agoFinallylemmy.mlimagemessage-square27arrow-up1728cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1728imageFinallylemmy.ml@cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 4 months agomessage-square27cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-square@Xuderis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink67•4 months agoThis plus the perfect monitor rotation (22°) makes for peak efficiency.
minus-square@mEEGal@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink10•4 months agonice password you fave there. looks secure 👌 keep it safe
minus-square@MajorHavoc@programming.devlinkfedilink4•4 months agoCrap. I wish people wouldn’t put my password on their monitors after I ask them to stop.
minus-square@MTK@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink6•4 months agoAmature, I have 2 ultra wides at 45 degrees each, creating a V shape
minus-square@Xuderis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink6•4 months ago45° being suboptimal is actually covered in the article!
minus-square@MTK@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink4•4 months agoIt cancels out once you have 2 at opposite ends
minus-square@Classy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink2•edit-24 months ago22° assumes a specific aspect ratio. Assuming this monitor has an aspect of 9:32, the angle would be much smaller. Though I’m not sure how to calculate it lol. It looks like it’s probably closer to 15°
This plus the perfect monitor rotation (22°) makes for peak efficiency.
lol
Spoiler
nice password you fave there. looks secure 👌
keep it safe
Crap. I wish people wouldn’t put my password on their monitors after I ask them to stop.
Amature, I have 2 ultra wides at 45 degrees each, creating a V shape
45° being suboptimal is actually covered in the article!
It cancels out once you have 2 at opposite ends
22° assumes a specific aspect ratio. Assuming this monitor has an aspect of 9:32, the angle would be much smaller. Though I’m not sure how to calculate it lol. It looks like it’s probably closer to 15°