• TheTechnician27
      link
      fedilink
      English
      154 months ago

      It’s fascinating to me that people prefer shitty nagware over 7-zip only because they think they’re “getting one over” by not paying for inferior software and/or feel nostalgic for it.

          • @cley_faye@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            For a good while, the UI in 7-Zip was so atrocious merely extracting an existing archive was not obvious. It definitely improved over that.

            I’d argue that even today, WinRAR UI is more intuitive than 7-Zip, but it is largely irrelevant since both have decent integration with windows file explorer anyway, which was also something 7-Zip lacked for a while.

      • Ace
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        this? Sort of. In Windows, an archive within an archive within an archive wouldn’t be flagged as a “file downloaded from the internet” so could be executed without malware checks. It’s a windows-specific issue and is only an issue if you’re downloading an untrusted archive from the internet. It’s patched in the latest version.

      • @kitnaht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yeah, WinRAR averages about 3 per year.

        All software stacks are going to be vulnerable in some way or another. We don’t have a way to create perfect software just yet.