KidM to Cybersecurity@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 4 months agoGoogle now allows digital fingerprinting of its userswww.malwarebytes.comexternal-linkmessage-square43arrow-up1186
arrow-up1186external-linkGoogle now allows digital fingerprinting of its userswww.malwarebytes.comKidM to Cybersecurity@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 4 months agomessage-square43
minus-square@Eeyore_Syndrome@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-24 months agoAll I known is DivestOS is dead as is Mull 😮. https://web.archive.org/web/20250113132510/https://divestos.org/pages/our_apps And there’s things Vanadium/web view offer that Android Firefox never can: https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/firefox-chromium.html By default Vanadium’s JIT JavaScript is blocked. Can easily turn off regular JavaScript if ya want on site settings.
minus-square@unhrpetby@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish3•4 months ago this article does not attempt to compare the privacy practices of each browser but rather their resistance to exploitation. The Madaidans article lacks relevance, we are talking about fingerprinting.
minus-square@sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish2•4 months ago Android Firefox never can That’s just not true, many of those are things that Android Firefox likely won’t do, but that doesn’t mean they can’t do it. That said, I care more about privacy than theoretical attacks. Companies are tracking me, black hats might attack me.
All I known is DivestOS is dead as is Mull 😮.
And there’s things Vanadium/web view offer that Android Firefox never can:
By default Vanadium’s JIT JavaScript is blocked. Can easily turn off regular JavaScript if ya want on site settings.
The Madaidans article lacks relevance, we are talking about fingerprinting.
That’s just not true, many of those are things that Android Firefox likely won’t do, but that doesn’t mean they can’t do it.
That said, I care more about privacy than theoretical attacks. Companies are tracking me, black hats might attack me.