@user@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world • 2 years agoopinionlemmy.worldimagemessage-square79arrow-up11.07K
arrow-up11.07Kimageopinionlemmy.world@user@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world • 2 years agomessage-square79
minus-square@JackLSauce@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•2 years agoI could see this being perceived very differently based on the monitor on which it’s displayed
minus-square@aleph@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish3•2 years agoIt was presumably designed for old CRT monitors with a 4:3 aspect ratio. Either way, it’s not 2005 any more.
minus-squareGhoeliancakelinkfedilinkEnglish5•edit-22 years agoIt’s 16:10 (1920x1200), pretty sure it’s the second most used aspect ratio, after 16:9.
minus-square@aleph@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoI meant originally. The version above was taken from an unofficial source.
I could see this being perceived very differently based on the monitor on which it’s displayed
It was presumably designed for old CRT monitors with a 4:3 aspect ratio. Either way, it’s not 2005 any more.
It’s 16:10 (1920x1200), pretty sure it’s the second most used aspect ratio, after 16:9.
I meant originally. The version above was taken from an unofficial source.