riwo to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 10 months agoyeahh gay sex rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square35arrow-up1323
arrow-up1323imageyeahh gay sex rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneriwo to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 10 months agomessage-square35
minus-square@Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink2•10 months agowait i just realized, are you actually saying that being married to multiple people is bad somehow?
minus-squareNorah (pup/it/she)cakelinkfedilinkEnglish9•10 months agoPersonally, thanks to polygamy’s history and recency to current times, yes, I think being married to multiple people is a bad idea. I’m for keeping it illegal until we can be sure it won’t be used like that again. I don’t think now is that time.
minus-square@Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink1•10 months agoi really don’t like that reasoning, that sounds way to close to the reasoning used to make gay marriage illegal. Who are you to decide whether i get to marry the people i love?
minus-squareNorah (pup/it/she)cakelinkfedilinkEnglish4•10 months agoAnd I don’t think it’s valid at all to compare the two. Polygamists were never “oppressed”, they were the ones doing the oppression (of their wives).
wait i just realized, are you actually saying that being married to multiple people is bad somehow?
Personally, thanks to polygamy’s history and recency to current times, yes, I think being married to multiple people is a bad idea. I’m for keeping it illegal until we can be sure it won’t be used like that again. I don’t think now is that time.
i really don’t like that reasoning, that sounds way to close to the reasoning used to make gay marriage illegal.
Who are you to decide whether i get to marry the people i love?
And I don’t think it’s valid at all to compare the two. Polygamists were never “oppressed”, they were the ones doing the oppression (of their wives).
deleted by creator