• @xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    214
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Newsweek: we’re such shit journalists that we don’t know what overhauls means and probably meant to use “overtakes”.

    (Just to be clear, this wasn’t a copy error on the poster - the article title is literally that)

    • quicklime
      link
      fedilink
      5811 months ago

      I was imagining her giving him a combination makeover and tune-up 😆

    • @blackbrook@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      1211 months ago

      I had to look it up, but using overhaul with the meaning of overtake is apparently valid. It sounds odd to me, and I’ve never actually heard it used that way, but Merriam-Webster validates it.

      • @xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        611 months ago

        Oh weird, I even asked around with some of my linguistically minded coworkers and nobody was familiar with that expression. I wonder if there’s a region where it’s a more common usage.

        • jackeryjoo
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Language is always evolving, never static. A dictionary and the definitions are backwards looking always. Dictionaries are always trying to keep up with the evolutions of language, but they’ll always lag behind.

          Just keep in mind that words change how they’re used over our lifetimes, and it never stops.

          E. G. Irregardless is now a valid word, when 15 and 20 years ago it was people mixing up regardless or irrespective so now I don’t even get that high horse anymore 😉

    • AmidFuror
      link
      fedilink
      611 months ago

      That and they could have directly said she’s ahead by 9 points amongst independents.

      • @frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        411 months ago

        Think less like a person trying to get your point across in a clear manner, and more like a person trying to generate clicks for money.