• @DillyDaily@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    orientated

    Is this common in American English? I don’t think I’ve ever seen the word oriented double handled like that. Irregardless, it slew me

    • @GiveMemes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      At least with orientated it kind makes sense because orientation is the process of orienting, so to have done the process would be to be orientated in a weird way but irregardless will always irk me because the ir and the less make a double negative, making the meaning as written ‘with regard’ which just doesn’t make any sense whatsoever. Like if somebody misunderstood a sentence with a double negative we would call them wrong but because it’s a single word they get to change the entire language, regardless of its structure and rules? Seems kinda bogus to me.

      • @psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        You can double for intensification. Language isn’t maths, you cannot count negations to reach meaning.

    • tiredofsametab
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      I’m a native US English speaker. I would only ever say oriented. As a kid, not knowing the “correct” form, I got corrected for saying orientated. I watch content from a lot of countries and do hear at least some British English speakers using orientated.

    • Log in | Sign up
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      “Orientated” is reasonably common in British English, I think. I remember thinking someone had misspelt it the first time I saw “oriented” written down.