David GerardM to SneerClub@awful.systemsEnglish • 1 year agowhat if, right, what if our super-duper-autocomplete was just tricking us so it could TAKE OVER ZEE VORLD AHAHAHAHAHAHA! that'd be wild, heywww.lesswrong.commessage-square32arrow-up140
arrow-up140external-linkwhat if, right, what if our super-duper-autocomplete was just tricking us so it could TAKE OVER ZEE VORLD AHAHAHAHAHAHA! that'd be wild, heywww.lesswrong.comDavid GerardM to SneerClub@awful.systemsEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square32
minus-square@FermiEstimate@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish30•1 year ago I conclude that scheming is a disturbingly plausible outcome of using baseline machine learning methods to train goal-directed AIs sophisticated enough to scheme (my subjective probability on such an outcome, given these conditions, is ~25%). Out: vibes and guesswork In: “subjective probability”
minus-squareflere-imsaholinkfedilinkEnglish24•1 year agoat one of the places i worked this kind of data was called assnumbers.
Out: vibes and guesswork
In: “subjective probability”
at one of the places i worked this kind of data was called assnumbers.