I mean, his is embosssed, but if I were choosing a logo for my new brand “x.com”, I don’t think I’d choose something that looks a lot like x.org’s logo.
Oh, that’s also a thought. IIRC Intel tried trademarking the letter “i” at one point and the USPTO wouisn’t allow it, so I dunno if a single-character trademark is considered distinctive enough. Xorg’s has more stuff to it than just the base letter.
It looks kind of similar to Xorg’s logo to me.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/90/X.Org_Logo.svg/1279px-X.Org_Logo.svg.png
I mean, his is embosssed, but if I were choosing a logo for my new brand “x.com”, I don’t think I’d choose something that looks a lot like x.org’s logo.
It’s worse, unicode already has the “𝕏” character for the past 22 years:
https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+1D54F
Oh, that’s also a thought. IIRC Intel tried trademarking the letter “i” at one point and the USPTO wouisn’t allow it, so I dunno if a single-character trademark is considered distinctive enough. Xorg’s has more stuff to it than just the base letter.
Despite this, when I do a Google search on “𝕏”, it pretends that I searched for “X”.
So although it may look different, it behaves all the same.