@TheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.worldimagemessage-square90arrow-up1421
arrow-up1421imageSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.world@TheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square90
minus-square@Miaou@jlai.lulinkfedilink5•1 year agoWith such a broad definition you could call even Haskell an oop language
minus-squareEthanlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoSo you’re arguing that “Object oriented” shouldn’t apply to languages that are oriented around objects?
With such a broad definition you could call even Haskell an oop language
So you’re arguing that “Object oriented” shouldn’t apply to languages that are oriented around objects?