@silence7@slrpnk.net to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoTrump told donors he will crush pro-Palestinian protests, deport demonstrators | Speaking to wealthy donors behind closed doors, he said that he supports Israel’s right to continue “its war on terror.wapo.stmessage-square317arrow-up1618
arrow-up1618external-linkTrump told donors he will crush pro-Palestinian protests, deport demonstrators | Speaking to wealthy donors behind closed doors, he said that he supports Israel’s right to continue “its war on terror.wapo.st@silence7@slrpnk.net to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square317
minus-square@FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink10•1 year agoDo you mean russian asset Jill Stein?
minus-squareVictoria Antoinette linkfedilink3•edit-21 year agoshe’s not a russian asset. this is libel. edit have fun with this comment chain. it’s a wild ride.
minus-square@FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•1 year agoIf that were the case, wouldn’t she have sued?
minus-squareVictoria Antoinette linkfedilink1•1 year agoyou think she can use every internet commenter? when someone lies about you, you run right to your lawyer?
minus-square@FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•1 year agoNo, if it were libel, there wouldn’t be articles posted about it.
minus-square@FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•1 year agoA quick Google search could’ve answered that question for you. you’re not arguing in good faith, but I’ll still throw ya a bone. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna951166 https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/19/politics/jill-stein-responds-clinton-gabbard-russian-asset-cnntv/index.html https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/466594-jill-stein-i-am-not-a-russian-spy/amp/
minus-squareVictoria Antoinette linkfedilink1•1 year agocnn and the hill links 404. the NBC news link does not say she is a Russian asset
minus-squareVictoria Antoinette linkfedilink1•1 year agooh. weird. I got em to work. both of those articles are just her saying it’s not true. they are not evidence she is a Russian asset.
minus-square@FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•1 year agoExactly. If it were libel, she’d sue.
minus-square@blazera@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoYou talking about that one photo? You wont believe who else has been to Russia several times.
Do you mean russian asset Jill Stein?
she’s not a russian asset. this is libel.
edit
have fun with this comment chain. it’s a wild ride.
If that were the case, wouldn’t she have sued?
you think she can use every internet commenter? when someone lies about you, you run right to your lawyer?
No, if it were libel, there wouldn’t be articles posted about it.
which one?
A quick Google search could’ve answered that question for you. you’re not arguing in good faith, but I’ll still throw ya a bone.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna951166
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/19/politics/jill-stein-responds-clinton-gabbard-russian-asset-cnntv/index.html
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/466594-jill-stein-i-am-not-a-russian-spy/amp/
cnn and the hill links 404. the NBC news link does not say she is a Russian asset
oh. weird. I got em to work. both of those articles are just her saying it’s not true. they are not evidence she is a Russian asset.
Exactly. If it were libel, she’d sue.
You talking about that one photo? You wont believe who else has been to Russia several times.