@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 1 year agoPlacebozmander.xyzimagemessage-square46arrow-up11.17K
arrow-up11.17KimagePlacebozmander.xyz@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square46
minus-squareagentshagslinkfedilinkEnglish57•1 year agoThe important thing is that you believe there was a study ;p
minus-square@katja@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglish14•1 year agoYeah, I haven’t read the study of course. Only read about it. Which makes the claim above even more dubious. But hey, this is the future, who has the time to fact check anymore?
minus-square@Klear@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish10•1 year agoIf you only read about it that gives it 50% chance at best at being true. Luckily I also read about it, so together that makes it 100% true.
minus-squareTJA!linkfedilinkEnglish8•1 year agoYou could ask an AI, maybe they’ll invent a source for you
The important thing is that you believe there was a study ;p
Yeah, I haven’t read the study of course. Only read about it. Which makes the claim above even more dubious. But hey, this is the future, who has the time to fact check anymore?
If you only read about it that gives it 50% chance at best at being true. Luckily I also read about it, so together that makes it 100% true.
Math checks out.
You could ask an AI, maybe they’ll invent a source for you