@realitista@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 1 year agoNon-binarylemmy.worldimagemessage-square209arrow-up11.43K
arrow-up11.43KimageNon-binarylemmy.world@realitista@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 1 year agomessage-square209
minus-square@stanleytweedle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish64•1 year agoFeel like there’s a Set Theory issue with this but I barely understand what little I can remember about it.
minus-squarepooberbee (they/she)linkfedilink38•1 year agoDoes the gender of all non-self-containing genders contain itself? This is the fundamental question of gender theory.
minus-square@gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink1•1 year agoA bit can have two states: true or false. Additionally, the bit can be disabled altogether (null).
Feel like there’s a Set Theory issue with this but I barely understand what little I can remember about it.
Does the gender of all non-self-containing genders contain itself? This is the fundamental question of gender theory.
No, it’s only Russell’s question.
A bit can have two states:
trueorfalse. Additionally, the bit can be disabled altogether (null).