@Forester@yiffit.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agorollin' coalyiffit.netimagemessage-square149arrow-up1586
arrow-up1586imagerollin' coalyiffit.net@Forester@yiffit.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square149
minus-square@NegativeInf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink14•1 year agoBoth have a storage problem. But coal has a destroys the atmosphere problem. So, yes, trade-offs.
minus-square@deegeese@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilink4•1 year agoYou’re moving the goalposts after they debunked the first claim.
minus-square@9bananas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink8•1 year ago“debunking” requires a source… otherwise they just put forth a claim
Both have a storage problem. But coal has a destroys the atmosphere problem. So, yes, trade-offs.
You’re moving the goalposts after they debunked the first claim.
“debunking” requires a source… otherwise they just put forth a claim