@tsugu@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoI respect people who don't like snaps, but Canonical will not abandon a successful projectslrpnk.netimagemessage-square92arrow-up1291
arrow-up1291imageI respect people who don't like snaps, but Canonical will not abandon a successful projectslrpnk.net@tsugu@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square92
minus-square@fruitycoder@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink26•edit-21 year agoNix, guix, flatpak, and OSI images are all better “universal” packages managers on sheer technical merits while also not be a vendor locked proprietary solution. Snaps are worse than what Redhat is doing.
minus-squaredream_weasellinkfedilink6•1 year agoSheer* probably. Unless there a technical merit about cutting stuff.
minus-squaredream_weasellinkfedilink4•1 year agoNp. We programmer types gotta help each other keep docs sharp ;)
Nix, guix, flatpak, and OSI images are all better “universal” packages managers on sheer technical merits while also not be a vendor locked proprietary solution.
Snaps are worse than what Redhat is doing.
Sheer* probably. Unless there a technical merit about cutting stuff.
Thx!
Np. We programmer types gotta help each other keep docs sharp ;)
Also than*
MR accepted. Thx!