• @FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    Yeahp, I was explicitly referring to the young.

    I think these problems do go underdiagnosed at large scale, but when half a classroom “thinks” that they “might be” autistic, then clearly it’s an issue of mentality.

    • Liz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      It is half the classroom, or is it more like 5%? Because the autistic rate is somewhere around 2%, so you would probably expect a slightly higher rate of people to guess they’re autistic when you’re dealing with a population known for struggling to understand themselves.

      • @FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        That’s the core of my statement, if it’s only 5% then that’s good and we can work with that. If it’s half then something is wrong with what the class thinks.

        • NoSpiritAnimal
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 year ago

          You’re not making any sort of factual statement, you’re making a series of suppositions about people you’ve not met without any underlying evidence or even a firm idea on what problem you say you’re identifying.

          You’re sharing your (uninformed) opinion and expecting others to give it weight.

          • @intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            They’re neither factual statements, nor suppositions. They’re conditional statements.

            This person is stating a fact about the overall landscape of the possible realities.

            IF we ever find ourselves in a situation where 50% of people think they might be autistic, THEN we have a problem with the mentality.

            The word IF removes a clause from the role of assertion.

            The opinion is the entire IF-THEN connection, not any of the clauses inside it.