@Waffelson@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world • 1 year agoIf we had partieslemmy.worldimagemessage-square47arrow-up1445
arrow-up1445imageIf we had partieslemmy.world@Waffelson@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world • 1 year agomessage-square47
minus-squareCaptainBasculinlinkfedilink6•1 year agoYou can technically install dpkg onto arch; but it’s not reccomended.
minus-square@renzev@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink17•1 year agoSpeaking of not recommended, you can technically install arch on an NTFS partition
minus-squareSandbaglinkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoWhy? This seems cool and everything but why would you do this, just to say I can?
minus-squareAndromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼linkfedilink5•1 year agoI have no idea, just came across it on GitHub one day and found it pretty funny. It seems to be pretty unstable though.
You can technically install dpkg onto arch; but it’s not reccomended.
Speaking of not recommended, you can technically install arch on an NTFS partition
You can also install Windows on btrfs
Why?
This seems cool and everything but why would you do this, just to say I can?
I have no idea, just came across it on GitHub one day and found it pretty funny. It seems to be pretty unstable though.
I can smell data loss issues just by reading this