Ignacio to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • edit-21 year agolemmy.rulemedia.kbin.socialimagemessage-square75arrow-up1225
arrow-up1225imagelemmy.rulemedia.kbin.socialIgnacio to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • edit-21 year agomessage-square75
minus-square@A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkEnglish19•1 year agoI mean they’re not wrong, but it does seem silly to complain about American politics on a website where most people are American. They could block instances/users posting content they don’t want to see, or browse by “subscribed.”
minus-squareLinkOpensChest.wavlinkfedilink6•1 year agoI’ve personally considered blocking .world, but I like a lot of the users there and so I’d miss seeing them around. Like stamets and hamid, for instance (no pun intended)
minus-squareNeatolinkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoI don’t think that blocks the users just the communities. If those users post to other instances I think you can still see them.
minus-squareLinkOpensChest.wavlinkfedilink3•1 year agoYeah true, but in this case I do like seeing their posts on .world communities
minus-square@Korne127@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•1 year agoWell, I personally didn’t notice anything like that tbh, or at least not more than on other social media platforms like Reddit
I mean they’re not wrong, but it does seem silly to complain about American politics on a website where most people are American.
They could block instances/users posting content they don’t want to see, or browse by “subscribed.”
I’ve personally considered blocking .world, but I like a lot of the users there and so I’d miss seeing them around. Like stamets and hamid, for instance (no pun intended)
I don’t think that blocks the users just the communities. If those users post to other instances I think you can still see them.
Yeah true, but in this case I do like seeing their posts on .world communities
Well, I personally didn’t notice anything like that tbh, or at least not more than on other social media platforms like Reddit