@FakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish • 1 year agoPerspective rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square23arrow-up1768
arrow-up1768imagePerspective rulelemmy.blahaj.zone@FakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square23
minus-square@wellee@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•1 year agoWouldn’t that make more sense? Eagles wouldn’t talk to mice, they’d eat them. I think a songbird would have made sense since they share bird feeders with the mice lol
minus-square@Duranie@literature.cafelinkfedilink11•1 year agoLet’s reframe this a moment - Wealthy person 1 “you ever go hungry?” Wealthy person 2 “no, not at all” Wealthy person 1 “I have no idea what that poor person was complaining about.”
minus-square@wellee@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•1 year agoInteresting interpretation, Nathan Pyle doesn’t usually do political comics though. I think this one is just supposed to be fun.
minus-squaretrashcanlinkfedilink4•1 year ago Nathan Pyle doesn’t usually do political comics For good reason lol. But still, not sure how someone could make this and not see something more in it.
Wouldn’t that make more sense? Eagles wouldn’t talk to mice, they’d eat them.
I think a songbird would have made sense since they share bird feeders with the mice lol
Let’s reframe this a moment -
Wealthy person 1 “you ever go hungry?”
Wealthy person 2 “no, not at all”
Wealthy person 1 “I have no idea what that poor person was complaining about.”
Interesting interpretation, Nathan Pyle doesn’t usually do political comics though. I think this one is just supposed to be fun.
For good reason lol. But still, not sure how someone could make this and not see something more in it.