@smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comexternal-linkmessage-square153arrow-up1822
arrow-up1822external-linkThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.com@smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square153
minus-square@frezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish13•1 year agoIt’s usually easy enough to adapt it as needed. It can typically send signals compatible with HDMI and DVI-D just fine.
minus-square@zarenki@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish10•1 year agoThe passive adapters that connect to DP++ ports probably still rely on this HDMI specific driver/firmware support for these features.
It’s usually easy enough to adapt it as needed. It can typically send signals compatible with HDMI and DVI-D just fine.
The passive adapters that connect to DP++ ports probably still rely on this HDMI specific driver/firmware support for these features.