GregorTacTac to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 1 year agoPrivacy rulefiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square35arrow-up1868
arrow-up1868imagePrivacy rulefiles.catbox.moeGregorTacTac to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 1 year agomessage-square35
minus-square@null@slrpnk.netlinkfedilink3•1 year agoSo you think it’s wise to give civilians unrestricted access to military intelligence, and allow them to hand that over to hostile foreign governments?
minus-squarePsychadelligoatlinkfedilinkEnglish23•1 year agoThey were clearly talking about the politicians being he correct target of unrestricted information access and not the state itself Likely for the obvious reason your alluding to here
So you think it’s wise to give civilians unrestricted access to military intelligence, and allow them to hand that over to hostile foreign governments?
They were clearly talking about the politicians being he correct target of unrestricted information access and not the state itself
Likely for the obvious reason your alluding to here
Okay, but that’s not what OP was talking about.
deleted by creator